Users report that Contentstack excels in its Ease of Admin with a score of 9.1, making it easier for teams to manage their content workflows compared to Builder.io's score of 8.5.
Reviewers mention that Builder.io shines in Content Scheduling, achieving a high score of 9.5, which allows users to effectively plan and automate their content releases, while Contentstack scores 8.7 in this area.
G2 users highlight that Builder.io offers superior Personalization features, scoring 9.1, which enhances user engagement through tailored content, whereas Contentstack's score is 7.6.
Users on G2 note that Contentstack's Versioning capabilities are robust, with a score of 8.6, allowing for better content management and rollback options compared to Builder.io's impressive score of 9.4.
Reviewers say that Builder.io's Drag and Drop functionality is highly intuitive, scoring 9.3, which simplifies the content creation process, while Contentstack's score in this area is not specified but is generally perceived as less user-friendly.
Users report that both platforms have strong Quality of Support, with both scoring 8.9, but Builder.io has a slight edge in user satisfaction, as reviewers mention a more responsive support team.
What do you like most about Contentstack for content management, and what improvements could be made?
2 Comments
JS
How easy it is to create, manage and streamline the work.Read more
What is Contentstack?
1 Comment
CM
Contentstack is a headless CMS with an API-first approach that puts content at the center. It is designed to empower content editors to update content in...Read more
What kind of support does Contentstack provide?
1 Comment
CM
Contentstack provides 24x7 in product chat support. You can contact the support team through in-product chat or by emailing support@contentstack.com....Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.