Users report that Contentful excels in its Developer Tools with a score of 8.9, making it a preferred choice for teams that prioritize custom development and integration capabilities. In contrast, Builder.io, while still functional, does not match this level of developer support.
Reviewers mention that Builder.io shines in Content Scheduling, scoring 9.5, which allows users to effectively manage their content release timelines. Contentful, with a score of 8.3, offers scheduling but lacks the same level of intuitive features.
G2 users highlight Builder.io's superior Rich Text Editor with a score of 8.6, which provides a more user-friendly experience for content authors compared to Contentful's score of 7.8. This makes Builder.io a better option for teams focused on ease of content creation.
Users on G2 report that Builder.io's Approval Process is more streamlined, scoring 8.5, which enhances collaboration among team members. Contentful, with a score of 7.9, offers approval features but lacks the same level of efficiency.
Reviewers mention that Contentful's Multi-CMS Support is a strong point, scoring 9.0, which is beneficial for organizations managing multiple content management systems. Builder.io, while capable, does not provide the same breadth of support in this area.
Users say that Builder.io's Customization options are extensive, scoring 9.6, allowing for a high degree of personalization in design and functionality. Contentful, with a score of 8.2, offers customization but does not reach the same level of flexibility.
You can do dynamic validation on anything, but it would require that you wrap the open source contentful field editors with your own javascript validation...Read more
What is Contentful used for?
1 Comment
D
Managing the content of the application in the cloud whether its Mobile App or Website Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.