Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare BugSnag and OpenText Application Quality Management 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Qase
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
UptimeRobot
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuerySurge
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (42.1% of reviews)
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free Trial Per Month
No pricing available
BugSnag
Star Rating
(38)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (42.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free Trial Per Month
Browse all 4 pricing plansOpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality ManagementSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText ALM Quality Center excels in its Test Repository functionality, scoring a remarkable 9.1, which allows for comprehensive management of test cases and results. In contrast, BugSnag, while strong in bug monitoring, does not have a dedicated test repository feature, which some users find limiting for test management.
- Reviewers mention that BugSnag shines in its Bug History feature, achieving a score of 9.7, which provides detailed insights into bug occurrences and resolutions. OpenText ALM Quality Center, while effective, does not match this level of detail, leading some users to prefer BugSnag for its superior bug tracking capabilities.
- G2 users highlight the ease of setup as a significant advantage for BugSnag, with a score of 9.0, making it more accessible for small businesses and teams looking to implement bug tracking quickly. OpenText ALM Quality Center, with a score of 7.2, is noted for its complexity, which can be a barrier for smaller teams.
- Users on G2 report that OpenText ALM Quality Center offers robust reporting capabilities, scoring 8.9, which is essential for enterprise-level project management. However, BugSnag's reporting features, while effective, do not provide the same depth, leading some users to feel that they lack comprehensive insights.
- Reviewers mention that BugSnag's analytics capabilities are highly praised, with a score of 8.9, allowing teams to gain actionable insights from bug data. In comparison, OpenText ALM Quality Center's analytics are seen as less intuitive, which can hinder quick decision-making for users.
- Users say that OpenText ALM Quality Center's customization options, scoring 7.7, can be somewhat limited compared to BugSnag, which allows for more tailored configurations to fit specific team needs. This flexibility in BugSnag is often highlighted as a key reason for its preference among smaller teams.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
BugSnag
Free
Free Trial
Per Month
- 1 user
- Error and performance monitoring
- 7.5K events and 1M spans per month
OpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing availableFree Trial
BugSnag
Free Trial is available
OpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
35
8.2
118
Ease of Use
8.8
35
7.9
118
Ease of Setup
9.2
13
7.2
61
Ease of Admin
8.8
8
7.2
59
Quality of Support
8.9
22
7.7
106
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.2
6
7.7
56
Product Direction (% positive)
7.6
34
6.8
116
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Website Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Experience
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Management
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Bug Reporting
8.7
9
8.3
11
8.1
7
9.2
12
8.5
9
8.5
12
Bug Monitoring
9.0
10
9.0
12
9.7
11
9.2
12
9.1
11
8.6
11
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
7.2
6
Not enough data
6.9
6
Not enough data
6.9
6
Not enough data
Application Performance Monitoring (APM)Hide 19 FeaturesShow 19 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Response
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Application Performance Monitoring (APM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Automation
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Procedural
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
BugSnag and OpenText Application Quality Management are categorized as Bug Tracking
Unique Categories
BugSnag is categorized as Application Performance Monitoring (APM), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM), and Website Monitoring
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Test Management, Requirements Management, ALM Software, Software Testing, Automation Testing, and AWS Marketplace
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
BugSnag
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
21.1%
Financial Services
13.2%
Information Technology and Services
10.5%
Internet
7.9%
Hospital & Health Care
7.9%
Other
39.5%
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
Discussions
What is BugSnag used for?
1 Comment
PS
To monitor your application performance and bug trackingRead more
BugSnag has no more discussions with answers
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
