Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare BugHerd and OpenText Application Quality Management

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
BugHerd
BugHerd
Star Rating
(171)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (72.9% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$50.00 Per Month
Free Trial is available
Browse all 3 pricing plans
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality Management
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that OpenText ALM Quality Center excels in its Test Repository functionality, scoring 9.1, which allows for comprehensive management of test cases and results. In contrast, BugHerd, while user-friendly, does not provide the same depth in test management, focusing more on bug tracking and feedback collection.
  • Reviewers mention that BugHerd shines in ease of use, with a G2 rating of 9.4, making it particularly appealing for small businesses. OpenText ALM Quality Center, with a lower ease of use rating of 7.8, may require more training and onboarding, which can be a barrier for smaller teams.
  • G2 users highlight BugHerd's superior feedback collection capabilities, scoring 9.7, which allows teams to gather user insights effectively. OpenText ALM Quality Center, while robust, does not match this level of user engagement, scoring 8.3 in test feedback.
  • Users on G2 report that OpenText ALM Quality Center offers strong traceability features, essential for enterprise-level projects, but BugHerd's focus on bug reporting and user feedback makes it more suitable for agile teams needing quick iterations.
  • Reviewers mention that BugHerd's version control and bug history features, scoring 9.4, provide a seamless experience for tracking changes and issues over time, while OpenText ALM Quality Center's version control is rated lower at 8.9, indicating less flexibility in managing project changes.
  • Users say that OpenText ALM Quality Center's automation capabilities are robust, particularly in test case execution, but BugHerd's simplicity in automating feedback loops is more appealing for teams looking for quick and efficient bug tracking solutions.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
BugHerd
Standard
$50.00
Per Month
Browse all 3 pricing plans
OpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing available
Free Trial
BugHerd
Free Trial is available
OpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.2
142
8.2
118
Ease of Use
9.4
143
7.9
118
Ease of Setup
9.4
110
7.2
61
Ease of Admin
9.4
94
7.2
59
Quality of Support
9.0
94
7.7
106
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.5
80
7.7
56
Product Direction (% positive)
9.6
134
6.8
116
Features by Category
Not enough data
8.8
11
Functionality
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Management
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
8.3
98
8.8
13
Bug Reporting
9.3
84
8.3
11
9.3
80
9.2
12
9.2
87
8.5
12
Bug Monitoring
Feature Not Available
9.0
12
9.2
84
9.2
12
9.4
77
8.6
11
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
6.8
11
Not enough data
6.5
11
Not enough data
6.7
11
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.7
6
Functionality
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Automation
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Enterprise Feedback ManagementHide 12 FeaturesShow 12 Features
8.7
28
Not enough data
Generative AI
7.8
9
Not enough data
7.6
9
Not enough data
Survey Management
8.6
23
Not enough data
8.4
19
Not enough data
9.3
25
Not enough data
8.9
23
Not enough data
Process Management
9.3
27
Not enough data
9.2
24
Not enough data
9.0
23
Not enough data
9.3
23
Not enough data
System Management
8.9
20
Not enough data
8.6
17
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Requirements ManagementHide 6 FeaturesShow 6 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Procedural
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
BugHerd
BugHerd
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management
BugHerd and OpenText Application Quality Management are categorized as Bug Tracking
Unique Categories
BugHerd
BugHerd is categorized as Enterprise Feedback Management
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Test Management, Requirements Management, ALM Software, Software Testing, Automation Testing, and AWS Marketplace
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
BugHerd
BugHerd
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
72.9%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
23.5%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
3.6%
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
12.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
21.6%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
66.4%
Reviewers' Industry
BugHerd
BugHerd
Marketing and Advertising
30.7%
Design
12.0%
Computer Software
10.8%
Information Technology and Services
7.8%
E-Learning
4.2%
Other
34.3%
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
Alternatives
BugHerd
BugHerd Alternatives
Usersnap
Usersnap
Add Usersnap
Userback
Userback
Add Userback
Jira
Jira
Add Jira
Luciq
Luciq
Add Luciq
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management Alternatives
Perforce ALM
Perforce ALM
Add Perforce ALM
TestRail
TestRail
Add TestRail
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest
Add Tricentis qTest
Zephyr Enterprise
Zephyr Enterprise
Add Zephyr Enterprise
Discussions
BugHerd
BugHerd Discussions
How do you use a BugHerd?
3 Comments
CA
I use bugherd to quickly communicate website changes to our website hosing service Read more
What is BugHerd?
1 Comment
Mike W.
MW
Is a simple to implement and robust tool for getting feedback about web sites and web applications. It's easy for our clients to note issues on the web...Read more
How do you add a new bug to BugHerd?
1 Comment
Official Response from BugHerd
Hi. There's a couple of ways to add feedback or bugs to a BugHerd project. The easiest way is to go to your website and click the sidebar (this will...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management Discussions
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
Petr K.
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers