Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Buffer and HopperHQ.com 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Cloud Campaign
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Planable
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (70.8% of reviews)
Small-Business (100.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
No pricing available
Buffer
Star Rating
(1,023)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (70.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 4 pricing plansHopperHQ.com
Star Rating
(22)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (100.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about HopperHQ.comSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Buffer excels in its Content Calendar feature, scoring 9.2, which allows for effective scheduling and planning of posts, while HopperHQ.com shines with a perfect score of 10.0, offering a more intuitive and visually appealing calendar interface.
- Reviewers mention that Buffer's Content Library is rated 8.7, providing a decent repository for media assets, but HopperHQ.com outperforms with a perfect score of 10.0, making it easier for users to organize and access their content.
- G2 users highlight that Buffer's Social Analytics feature scores 7.9, which is functional but lacks depth, whereas HopperHQ.com offers a slightly better score of 8.0, providing more insightful analytics that help users understand their audience engagement.
- Users on G2 appreciate Buffer's Social Publishing capabilities, scoring 9.3, but they note that HopperHQ.com surpasses this with a score of 9.8, offering more seamless integration with various social platforms and better scheduling options.
- Reviewers say that Buffer's Campaign Optimization feature scores 8.4, which is useful but could be more robust, while HopperHQ.com receives a higher score of 9.3, indicating a more effective approach to optimizing social media campaigns.
- Users report that Buffer's Quality of Support is rated at 8.5, which is satisfactory, but HopperHQ.com edges ahead with a score of 8.8, suggesting a more responsive and helpful customer service experience.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Buffer
Free
Free
For individuals and businesses getting started with social media.
- 3 social accounts
- Publish to Facebook, Instagram, X, LinkedIn, Google Business Profiles, Mastodon, Pinterest and Bluesky
- 10 scheduled posts per social account
HopperHQ.com
No pricing availableFree Trial
Buffer
Free Trial is available
HopperHQ.com
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
900
8.2
12
Ease of Use
9.2
906
9.4
17
Ease of Setup
9.2
325
9.4
11
Ease of Admin
9.1
309
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.5
644
8.8
13
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
269
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.2
880
9.2
15
Features by Category
Content & Collaboration
9.0
142
10.0(won by 1.0)
5
8.6
125
10.0(won by 1.4)
5
8.2(won by default)
105
Feature Not Available
8.6(won by default)
106
Not enough data
8.8(won by default)
115
Not enough data
8.5(won by default)
99
Not enough data
Social Management
7.9
666
8.0(won by 0.1)
9
9.3
787
9.8(won by 0.5)
10
8.4
642
9.3(won by 0.9)
5
8.3
693
9.3(won by 1.0)
10
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
8.6(won by default)
99
Feature Not Available
8.3(won by default)
25
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Social Media Management
7.2(won by default)
12
Not enough data
7.4(won by default)
12
Not enough data
6.9(won by default)
12
Not enough data
7.4(won by default)
12
Not enough data
7.2(won by default)
12
Not enough data
7.5(won by default)
12
Not enough data
7.2(won by default)
12
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Buffer and HopperHQ.com are categorized as Social Media Management
Unique Categories
Buffer has no unique categories
HopperHQ.com has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Buffer
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
HopperHQ.com
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Marketing and Advertising
23.1%
Computer Software
7.3%
Information Technology and Services
6.3%
Internet
5.3%
Non-Profit Organization Management
4.2%
Other
53.8%
Marketing and Advertising
40.9%
Luxury Goods & Jewelry
9.1%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
9.1%
Apparel & Fashion
9.1%
Consulting
4.5%
Other
27.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
Can I have tabs open for multiple companies at a time?
4 Comments
MM
I have one Buffer account with multiple clients on that one account, so I just click on which platform/client I want to work on within that (so just one...Read more
Which platforms are next on the Buffer integration roadmap?
2 Comments
GP
Buffer has a new feature to offer: Shop Grid.
It is a landing page made specifically for your Instagram profile, where you can direct people back to your...Read more
LinkedIn workarounds
2 Comments
ED
When a data source like Facebook or LinkedIn removes an API (the way the data is shared from their warehouse to someone else’s, like Buffer’s, and the way...Read more
What is HopperHQ.com used for?
1 Comment
Official Response from HopperHQ.com
Hopper HQ is a user-friendly social media scheduling and management tool designed to help businesses excel on social media.
With Hopper HQ, you can...Read more
HopperHQ.com has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
