Compare Buffer and Echobox

Buffer vs Echobox

• Users report that Buffer excels in its Post Performance analytics with a score of 9.3, allowing users to effectively track how their content is performing across various platforms. In contrast, Echobox shines in Social Analytics with a score of 9.3, providing deeper insights into competitor analysis and follower engagement.
• Reviewers mention that Buffer's Content Calendar feature is highly rated at 9.2, making it easy to plan and schedule posts. Echobox, however, offers a more robust Approval Workflows feature with a score of 9.3, which is particularly beneficial for teams needing to streamline content approval processes.
• G2 users highlight that Buffer's Social Publishing capabilities are strong, scoring 9.3, but Echobox outperforms with a score of 9.7, indicating a more seamless publishing experience across multiple channels.
• Users on G2 report that Buffer's Quality of Support is rated at 8.5, which some find lacking compared to Echobox's impressive score of 9.7, where users appreciate the responsive and helpful customer service.
• Reviewers mention that Buffer's Users and Permissions feature scores 8.8, which is adequate for small teams, but Echobox significantly outperforms with a score of 9.8, allowing for more granular control over user access and permissions.
• Users say that while Buffer provides decent Campaign Optimization tools with a score of 8.4, Echobox's tools are rated higher at 9.5, enabling users to better refine their campaigns for maximum impact.