Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Buddy and GitHub 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Codemagic
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (82.8% of reviews)
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
$0.00 1 users
Buddy
Star Rating
(208)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (82.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 5 pricing plansGitHub
Star Rating
(2,266)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that GitHub excels in its Integration capabilities, scoring 9.1, which allows seamless connections with various tools and services. In contrast, Buddy shines even brighter with a score of 9.5, making it a preferred choice for teams looking for extensive integration options.
- Reviewers mention that Buddy's Deployment-Ready Staging feature is particularly robust, earning a score of 9.6, which enhances the testing process before going live. GitHub, while still strong at 9.0, does not offer the same level of staging capabilities, which may be a deciding factor for teams focused on deployment efficiency.
- G2 users highlight that Buddy's Automation features are superior, with a score of 9.6, allowing for more streamlined workflows and reduced manual effort. GitHub's score of 8.9 indicates it has automation capabilities, but users report that they find Buddy's tools more intuitive and effective.
- Users on G2 report that GitHub's Access Control features are solid, scoring 9.0, which is essential for managing team permissions. However, Buddy matches this with a score of 9.4, and reviewers mention that Buddy offers more granular control options, making it easier to manage user roles and permissions.
- Reviewers mention that GitHub's Quality of Support is rated at 8.7, which is decent but not exceptional. In contrast, Buddy's support quality is rated at 8.9, with users noting quicker response times and more helpful resources, which can be crucial for teams needing timely assistance.
- Users say that GitHub's Ease of Use is rated at 8.7, which is user-friendly but can be overwhelming for beginners. Buddy, with a score of 9.5, is frequently praised for its intuitive interface, making it easier for new users to get started without a steep learning curve.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Buddy
Free
Free
For freelancers and sporadic deployments.
- 1 seat
- 1 runner
- 300 pipeline GB-minutes
GitHub
Free for Individuals and Organizations
$0.00
1 users
Basics for teams and developers
- Unlimited public/private repositories
- Unlimited collaborators
- 2,000 Actions minutes/month (Free for public repositories)
Free Trial
Buddy
Free Trial is available
GitHub
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.4
156
9.3
1,963
Ease of Use
9.5
156
8.7
1,979
Ease of Setup
9.3
80
9.0
590
Ease of Admin
9.2
75
8.7
450
Quality of Support
8.9
114
8.8
1,570
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.3
62
8.9
386
Product Direction (% positive)
9.2
148
8.9
1,915
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
8.9
142
Not enough data
9.1
147
Not enough data
8.7
144
Functionality
Not enough data
8.9
145
Not enough data
8.6
134
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
9.0
147
Not enough data
8.3
133
Processes
Not enough data
9.1
146
Not enough data
8.8
144
Not enough data
8.7
142
Administration
Not enough data
9.2
48
Not enough data
9.0
47
Analysis
Not enough data
8.7
47
Not enough data
8.9
50
Not enough data
8.9
48
Not enough data
9.0
50
Testing
Not enough data
9.3
49
Not enough data
8.6
44
Not enough data
8.7
45
Not enough data
8.9
43
Not enough data
8.7
42
Not enough data
9.0
43
Not enough data
8.5
42
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
10.0
14
Administration
Not enough data
9.1
98
Not enough data
9.0
97
Not enough data
8.8
99
Not enough data
9.2
99
Automation
Not enough data
8.9
97
Not enough data
8.7
91
Not enough data
8.8
96
Not enough data
8.9
91
IT Management
Not enough data
9.0
99
Not enough data
9.0
91
Not enough data
8.9
89
Functionality
9.6
50
9.1
238
9.5
50
9.2
241
9.2
46
8.9
238
Management
9.5
48
9.0
236
8.6
44
8.5
231
9.6
49
9.0
239
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
Not enough data
9.4
29
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
9.0
29
Not enough data
9.2
30
Not enough data
9.2
29
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
8.9
191
Not enough data
8.9
188
Not enough data
9.0
192
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
8.5
186
Not enough data
8.9
196
Not enough data
9.0
184
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
9.5
26
Not enough data
9.4
26
Not enough data
9.3
26
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
8.9
74
Not enough data
9.1
79
Not enough data
9.2
78
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
8.9
76
Not enough data
9.1
78
Not enough data
8.9
76
Management
9.4
22
8.9
137
9.4
19
9.2
137
9.5
20
8.6
133
Functionality
9.5
22
8.8
135
9.5
20
8.9
136
9.5
19
8.7
134
Processes
9.4
22
8.9
136
9.5
20
8.8
134
9.6
21
9.1
138
Functionality
9.3
45
|
Verified
9.3
223
9.0
43
|
Verified
9.0
212
9.2
39
|
Verified
8.7
204
Management
9.4
43
|
Verified
8.9
217
9.5
42
|
Verified
8.9
213
8.6
39
|
Verified
8.3
208
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
9.0
33
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
8.5
33
Not enough data
8.8
33
Documentation
Not enough data
8.8
185
Not enough data
8.8
179
Not enough data
8.6
170
Security
Not enough data
8.3
167
Not enough data
8.6
168
Not enough data
9.0
177
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Buddy and GitHub are categorized as Version Control Hosting, Continuous Integration, DevOps Platforms, and Continuous Delivery
Unique Categories
Buddy has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Buddy
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
GitHub
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
35.3%
Information Technology and Services
9.8%
Marketing and Advertising
7.4%
Program Development
6.9%
Internet
5.4%
Other
35.3%
Computer Software
31.7%
Information Technology and Services
22.7%
Internet
6.7%
Higher Education
3.4%
Financial Services
3.2%
Other
32.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
Buddy has no discussions with answers
What is GitHub used for?
8 Comments
MK
- store software source code
- use actions to execute CI / CD and publish artefacts / create releases
- lightweight software project managementRead more
What can GitHub be used for?
5 Comments
MS
It's a platform for version controlling. Where group of people collaborate each other and work on a single project. Read more
What does GitHub mean?
2 Comments
JV
It is a platform for doing projects based on serveral services like website development projects etcRead more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
