Users report that CircleCI excels in its Continuous Deployment capabilities, scoring 9.0, while Buddy shines even brighter with a score of 9.6, indicating a more seamless deployment process.
Reviewers mention that Buddy offers superior Workflow Visualization features, achieving a score of 9.5 compared to CircleCI's 8.9, making it easier for teams to track and manage their workflows effectively.
G2 users highlight CircleCI's strong Pipeline Control with a score of 8.8, but Buddy surpasses this with a score of 9.4, suggesting that Buddy provides more robust tools for managing complex pipelines.
Users on G2 say that Buddy's Automation features are particularly impressive, scoring 9.6, while CircleCI's score of 8.8 indicates that Buddy may offer more advanced automation capabilities.
Reviewers mention that CircleCI's Configuration Management is solid with a score of 8.8, but Buddy's score of 9.4 suggests a more user-friendly and effective approach to managing configurations.
Users report that Buddy's Integration capabilities are highly rated at 9.5, while CircleCI's score of 8.5 indicates that Buddy may provide a wider range of integrations with other tools and services.
Linux plans start with the ability to run one build simultaneously without parallelism at no charge. Open source projects get 3 additional free containers,...Read more
What is concurrency? What is parallelism?
1 Comment
Official Response from CircleCI
Concurrency refers to utilizing multiple containers to run multiple builds at the same time. Otherwise, if you don't have enough free containers available,...Read more
How do containers work?
1 Comment
Official Response from CircleCI
Every time you push to your VCS system, we checkout your code and run your build inside of a fresh, on-demand, and isolated Linux container pre-loaded with...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.