Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare BrowserStack and Tricentis Neoload 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
All in One Accessibility
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Testiny
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kualitee
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.0% of reviews)
Small-Business (38.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 user plan
No pricing available
BrowserStack
Star Rating
(2,613)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 user plan
Free Trial is available
Browse all 32 pricing plansTricentis Neoload
Star Rating
(31)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (38.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about Tricentis NeoloadSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that BrowserStack excels in providing a seamless experience for testing across various devices and browsers. Users appreciate its ability to integrate local testing, which significantly reduces the time spent on physical devices, making it a go-to choice for efficient software testing.
- Users say that Tricentis Neoload simplifies performance testing with its user-friendly interface. Many reviewers highlight how easy it is to set up tests and interpret results through clear graphs, which helps them quickly understand performance metrics without extensive digging.
- According to verified reviews, BrowserStack's extensive range of features makes it a versatile tool for testing. Users enjoy the ability to test on different devices and browsers, particularly noting the effectiveness of mobile testing in Chrome and Firefox, which enhances their overall testing efficiency.
- Reviewers mention that while Tricentis Neoload is praised for its performance testing capabilities, it has a smaller user base compared to BrowserStack, which may affect the availability of community support and resources. However, users still find it effective for simulating multiple users simultaneously, which is a significant advantage for load testing.
- G2 reviewers highlight that BrowserStack's ease of use is a strong point, with many users finding it straightforward to navigate and utilize its functionalities. This user-friendly approach is particularly beneficial for teams looking to streamline their testing processes without a steep learning curve.
- Users report that Tricentis Neoload's focus on performance testing is commendable, with features that allow for quick setup and effective simulation of user loads. However, the lack of recent reviews suggests that it may not be as actively discussed or updated as BrowserStack, which has a robust volume of recent user feedback.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
BrowserStack
Free Trial
$0.00
1 user plan
- Instant Access to Real Devices
- 30 mins each of interactive browser and mobile app testing
- 100 mins of automated browser testing
Tricentis Neoload
No pricing availableFree Trial
BrowserStack
Free Trial is available
Tricentis Neoload
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.8
2,283
9.0
27
Ease of Use
8.9
2,344
9.1
27
Ease of Setup
8.9
1,351
8.3
13
Ease of Admin
8.8
564
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.7
1,953
8.3
28
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
530
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.3
2,298
9.1
26
Features by Category
Functionality
7.7
115
9.0
22
7.7
112
8.5
22
8.4
116
8.9
22
Reporting
8.0
112
9.1
22
Functionality
8.5
277
Not enough data
8.4
274
Not enough data
8.7
270
Not enough data
Management
8.4
270
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.3
272
Not enough data
Functionality
8.6
1100
Not enough data
8.7
1090
Not enough data
8.8
1112
Not enough data
Management
8.4
1078
Not enough data
8.4
1050
Not enough data
8.4
1049
Not enough data
Monitoring
8.3
132
Not enough data
8.3
127
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Reporting
8.3
125
Not enough data
8.5
126
Not enough data
Automation
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.1
124
Not enough data
Functionality
8.2
128
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.4
127
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Generative AI
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Digital Accessibility Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
8.5
120
Not enough data
8.2
120
Not enough data
Reporting
8.4
120
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Functionality
8.4
126
Not enough data
8.3
126
Not enough data
8.2
119
Not enough data
Generative AI
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Digital Accessibility Tools
8.0
15
Not enough data
7.6
15
Not enough data
8.1
15
Not enough data
7.6
15
Not enough data
Functionality
8.6
872
9.2
8
8.6
868
9.0
8
8.2
844
8.5
8
8.5
858
9.0
8
Automation
8.4
833
9.2
8
8.5
856
9.2
8
8.5
840
8.5
8
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
7.6
48
Not enough data
7.5
48
Not enough data
7.5
47
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
7.7
144
Not enough data
7.5
137
Not enough data
7.5
135
Not enough data
Agentic AI - SAP Store
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Test Generation & Authoring
7.7
21
Not enough data
7.2
21
Not enough data
8.0
22
Not enough data
Test Maintenance & Resilience
7.2
21
Not enough data
7.5
20
Not enough data
7.7
23
Not enough data
Execution & Analytics
7.8
22
Not enough data
7.4
21
Not enough data
7.5
21
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
BrowserStack and Tricentis Neoload are categorized as Load Testing Tools, Software Testing, and Automation Testing
Unique Categories
BrowserStack is categorized as Test Management, Mobile App Testing, Digital Accessibility Platforms, Digital Accessibility Tools, and AI Software Testing Tools
Tricentis Neoload is categorized as SAP Store
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
BrowserStack
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Tricentis Neoload
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
22.7%
Information Technology and Services
20.6%
Financial Services
5.5%
Marketing and Advertising
4.0%
Retail
2.8%
Other
44.4%
Information Technology and Services
29.0%
Computer Software
9.7%
Information Services
6.5%
Financial Services
6.5%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
3.2%
Other
45.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
What are the benefits of automating a test case?
7 Comments
DD
It helps to reduce the manual testing efforts which ultimately reduces the testing resource and budget.Read more
What can BrowserStack do?
4 Comments
TN
BrowserStack is a cloud-based web and mobile testing platform that enables users to test their websites and apps on real browsers and mobile devices. It...Read more
Which of the following features are supported by BrowserStack automate ?*?
4 Comments
DD
Web/App Automate
Read more
Tricentis Neoload has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
