Compare BrowserStack and Tricentis Neoload 
BrowserStack vs Tricentis Neoload
- Users report that Tricentis Neoload excels in Stress Testing with a score of 9.5, while BrowserStack falls short with a score of 7.6. Reviewers mention that Neoload's ability to simulate high user loads is a standout feature for performance testing.
- Reviewers mention that Tricentis Neoload offers superior Test Variety with a score of 9.4 compared to BrowserStack's 8.5. Users say that Neoload provides a broader range of testing scenarios, which is crucial for comprehensive application performance assessments.
- G2 users highlight that Tricentis Neoload's Test Feedback functionality scores a perfect 10.0, while BrowserStack's is rated at 8.6. Users report that Neoload's feedback mechanisms are more robust, allowing for quicker iterations and improvements based on test results.
- Users on G2 indicate that Tricentis Neoload shines in Automated Regression Testing with a score of 8.4, whereas BrowserStack's score is lower at 8.2. Reviewers mention that Neoload's automation capabilities streamline the regression testing process significantly.
- Reviewers mention that BrowserStack has a strong edge in Ease of Use with a score of 8.9 compared to Neoload's 9.4. Users report that BrowserStack's interface is more intuitive, making it easier for teams to adopt and utilize effectively.
- Users say that Tricentis Neoload's Quality Assurance Dashboard is rated at 8.5, which provides comprehensive insights into testing outcomes, while BrowserStack's dashboard features are less detailed, leading to a score of 8.4. Reviewers mention that Neoload's dashboard helps teams make informed decisions based on real-time data.
- Instant Access to Real Devices
- 30 mins each of interactive browser and mobile app testing
- 100 mins of automated browser testing
A great tool for evaluation a website's responsiveness is BrowserStack and provide best customer services. It gives you the option to select from a variety of devices to test how your website works on various screen sizes and guarantees that its...
It's extremely slow and the sessions gets stuck all the time especially on MacOS. Hence, requries multiple restarts during development. Also, noticed it happening when using localhost.
I have been using NeoLoad for about 3 years now, compared to the previous tool I was using for scripting, NeoLoad is much better. It is really good for somebody who is not looking to write code to emulate the real user behavior. NeoLoad has a wide range of...
When you save something, it saves everything, takes ~3 mins in our case. When we try to start the test It loads all the SQL data variables to setup data and then uses that data to run the test. This process takes ~10 mins after clicking the run button.
A great tool for evaluation a website's responsiveness is BrowserStack and provide best customer services. It gives you the option to select from a variety of devices to test how your website works on various screen sizes and guarantees that its...
I have been using NeoLoad for about 3 years now, compared to the previous tool I was using for scripting, NeoLoad is much better. It is really good for somebody who is not looking to write code to emulate the real user behavior. NeoLoad has a wide range of...
It's extremely slow and the sessions gets stuck all the time especially on MacOS. Hence, requries multiple restarts during development. Also, noticed it happening when using localhost.
When you save something, it saves everything, takes ~3 mins in our case. When we try to start the test It loads all the SQL data variables to setup data and then uses that data to run the test. This process takes ~10 mins after clicking the run button.
