Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare BrowserStack and Tricentis qTest 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Testiny
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
All in One Accessibility
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kualitee
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.2% of reviews)
Mid-Market (45.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 user plan
No pricing available
BrowserStack
Star Rating
(2,572)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 user plan
Free Trial is available
Browse all 32 pricing plansTricentis qTest
Star Rating
(100)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (45.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about Tricentis qTestSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Tricentis qTest excels in its Test History feature, scoring 9.0, which allows teams to track and analyze past test executions effectively. In contrast, BrowserStack's Test History score of 8.6 indicates it may not provide the same depth of historical insights.
- Reviewers mention that BrowserStack shines in Ease of Use with a score of 8.9, making it more accessible for teams new to testing tools. Tricentis qTest, while still user-friendly, scores slightly lower at 8.4, which some users feel could be improved for onboarding new users.
- G2 users highlight the Quality of Support for BrowserStack, which scores 8.7, as being responsive and helpful, whereas Tricentis qTest, with a score of 8.4, has received mixed feedback regarding the timeliness of support responses.
- Users on G2 report that Tricentis qTest's Test Variety score of 9.2 is a standout feature, allowing for a wide range of testing scenarios. In comparison, BrowserStack's Test Variety score of 8.5 suggests it may not offer the same level of flexibility in testing options.
- Reviewers mention that BrowserStack's Integration score of 8.4 is a strong point, as it seamlessly connects with various CI/CD tools, enhancing workflow efficiency. Tricentis qTest, with a score of 8.0, may require additional configuration for similar integrations.
- Users say that Tricentis qTest's Reporting capabilities, scoring 8.3, provide detailed insights into test results, which some users find more comprehensive than BrowserStack's reporting score of 8.4, indicating a slight edge in the depth of reporting features.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
BrowserStack
Free Trial
$0.00
1 user plan
- Instant Access to Real Devices
- 30 mins each of interactive browser and mobile app testing
- 100 mins of automated browser testing
Tricentis qTest
No pricing availableFree Trial
BrowserStack
Free Trial is available
Tricentis qTest
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.8
2,253
8.4
72
Ease of Use
8.9
2,313
8.4
74
Ease of Setup
8.9
1,321
8.0
38
Ease of Admin
8.8
556
7.9
20
Quality of Support
8.7
1,925
8.4
70
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
522
8.2
21
Product Direction (% positive)
9.3
2,267
9.1
80
Features by Category
Functionality
7.7
115
Not enough data
7.7
112
Not enough data
8.4
114
Not enough data
Reporting
8.0
112
Not enough data
Functionality
8.5
276
8.6
27
8.4
272
8.0
29
8.7
268
8.5
28
Management
8.4
271
8.3
28
Feature Not Available
8.2
27
8.3
270
8.1
26
Functionality
8.6
1094
Not enough data
8.7
1083
Not enough data
8.8
1101
Not enough data
Management
8.4
1074
Not enough data
8.3
1042
Not enough data
8.4
1047
Not enough data
Monitoring
8.2
132
Not enough data
8.3
128
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Reporting
8.3
126
Not enough data
8.4
127
Not enough data
Automation
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.0
124
Not enough data
Functionality
8.1
128
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.3
128
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Generative AI
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Digital Accessibility Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
8.4
121
Not enough data
8.2
121
Not enough data
Reporting
8.4
121
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Functionality
8.4
126
Not enough data
8.3
127
Not enough data
8.2
120
Not enough data
Generative AI
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Digital Accessibility Tools
8.0
15
Not enough data
7.6
15
Not enough data
8.1
15
Not enough data
7.6
15
Not enough data
Functionality
8.6
869
9.1
15
8.6
864
9.0
16
8.2
843
8.5
16
8.5
855
9.2
15
Automation
8.4
832
9.1
15
8.5
851
9.0
15
8.5
838
8.8
15
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
7.6
46
Not enough data
7.4
47
Not enough data
7.5
46
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
7.7
140
7.9
11
7.5
136
7.5
10
7.5
134
7.0
10
AI Test Generation & Authoring
7.6
20
Not enough data
7.2
21
Not enough data
7.9
21
Not enough data
Test Maintenance & Resilience
7.2
21
Not enough data
7.5
20
Not enough data
7.5
21
Not enough data
Execution & Analytics
7.8
22
Not enough data
7.4
21
Not enough data
7.5
21
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
BrowserStack and Tricentis qTest are categorized as Test Management, Software Testing, and Automation Testing
Unique Categories
BrowserStack is categorized as Load Testing Tools, Mobile App Testing, Digital Accessibility Platforms, Digital Accessibility Tools, and AI Software Testing Tools
Tricentis qTest has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
BrowserStack
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Tricentis qTest
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
22.8%
Information Technology and Services
20.4%
Financial Services
5.6%
Marketing and Advertising
4.0%
Retail
2.7%
Other
44.5%
Information Technology and Services
27.1%
Computer Software
22.9%
Financial Services
7.3%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
5.2%
Hospital & Health Care
4.2%
Other
33.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
What are the benefits of automating a test case?
7 Comments
DD
It helps to reduce the manual testing efforts which ultimately reduces the testing resource and budget.Read more
What can BrowserStack do?
4 Comments
TN
BrowserStack is a cloud-based web and mobile testing platform that enables users to test their websites and apps on real browsers and mobile devices. It...Read more
Which of the following features are supported by BrowserStack automate ?*?
4 Comments
DD
Web/App Automate
Read more
Does qTest integrate with JIRA?
1 Comment
Official Response from Tricentis qTest
qTest integrates with JIRA Cloud and JIRA Server, while also providing qTest Cloud or Server deployment options.
See this video here:...Read more
On-Boarding, Training, and continued support is a must have for any tool we adopt. How does QASymphony fit into our success?
1 Comment
Official Response from Tricentis qTest
Keeping our customers happy is a top priority, and it shows. We consistently get top satisfaction scores across the board.
Check out our customer info...Read more
What is frequency of updates/releases?
1 Comment
Official Response from Tricentis qTest
At QASymphony, we are releasing new features and product improvements throughout the year. Right now we are targeting to release between 8 - 10 times a...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
