Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare BrowserStack and mabl 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
All in One Accessibility
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kualitee
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Testiny
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.5% of reviews)
Mid-Market (44.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 user plan
Contact Us Per Year
BrowserStack
Star Rating
(2,479)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 user plan
Free Trial is available
Browse all 32 pricing plansmabl
Star Rating
(37)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us Per Year
Learn more about mablSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that mabl excels in its Quality of Support, scoring 9.2, which reviewers mention as being responsive and helpful, while BrowserStack's support quality is rated lower at 8.7, indicating potential delays in assistance.
- Reviewers mention that mabl's Automated Regression Testing feature is particularly robust, with a score of 8.4, allowing for seamless integration into existing workflows, whereas BrowserStack's similar functionality is rated slightly lower, which may affect user experience during testing.
- G2 users highlight mabl's Test Feedback feature, scoring 9.1, as a standout for providing actionable insights, while BrowserStack's feedback mechanism, rated at 8.6, may not offer the same depth of analysis, leading to less informed testing decisions.
- Users on G2 report that mabl's Customization options, rated at 8.8, allow for tailored testing environments, which is a significant advantage over BrowserStack's lower score of 8.2, where users feel limited in their ability to adapt the tool to specific needs.
- Reviewers mention that mabl's Test Variety is impressive, scoring 8.5, which enables users to conduct diverse testing scenarios effectively, while BrowserStack's equivalent feature is rated the same, but users feel it lacks the same level of flexibility.
- Users say that mabl's Real-Time Monitoring feature, with a score of 8.5, is highly effective for immediate feedback during testing, whereas BrowserStack's monitoring capabilities, rated at 8.4, may not provide the same level of immediacy, potentially impacting testing efficiency.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
BrowserStack
Free Trial
$0.00
1 user plan
- Instant Access to Real Devices
- 30 mins each of interactive browser and mobile app testing
- 100 mins of automated browser testing
mabl
Personalized Pricing
Contact Us
Per Year
Pricing is customized to your test coverage and scalability needs.
- Your pricing session will include:
- A custom quote
- ROI analysis
Free Trial
BrowserStack
Free Trial is available
mabl
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.8
2,209
8.6
28
Ease of Use
8.9
2,269
9.0
28
Ease of Setup
8.9
1,274
8.8
11
Ease of Admin
8.7
545
9.0
5
Quality of Support
8.7
1,883
9.2
28
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
512
9.3
5
Product Direction (% positive)
9.3
2,222
8.7
26
Features by Category
Functionality
7.7
115
Not enough data
7.7
112
Not enough data
8.4
114
Not enough data
Reporting
8.0
111
Not enough data
Functionality
8.5
272
Not enough data
8.4
267
Not enough data
8.7
265
Not enough data
Management
8.4
270
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.4
266
Not enough data
Functionality
8.6
1088
Not enough data
8.7
1075
Not enough data
8.8
1084
Not enough data
Management
8.4
1070
Not enough data
8.3
1033
Not enough data
8.4
1049
Not enough data
Monitoring
8.2
132
Not enough data
8.3
128
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Reporting
8.3
126
Not enough data
8.4
127
Not enough data
Automation
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.0
124
Not enough data
Functionality
8.1
128
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.3
128
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Generative AI
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Digital Accessibility Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
8.4
120
Not enough data
8.2
120
Not enough data
Reporting
8.4
120
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Functionality
8.4
124
Not enough data
8.3
125
Not enough data
8.2
119
Not enough data
Generative AI
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Digital Accessibility Tools
8.0
14
Not enough data
7.5
14
Not enough data
8.1
14
Not enough data
7.5
14
Not enough data
Functionality
8.6
866
9.1
17
8.6
859
9.2
17
8.2
844
8.8
17
8.5
849
8.5
17
Automation
8.4
833
8.3
16
8.5
844
9.0
17
8.5
838
8.8
17
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
7.6
45
Not enough data
7.4
46
Not enough data
7.5
45
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
7.6
129
Not enough data
7.5
128
Not enough data
7.4
128
Not enough data
AI Test Generation & Authoring
7.6
20
Not enough data
7.5
20
Not enough data
7.8
20
Not enough data
Test Maintenance & Resilience
7.3
20
Not enough data
7.5
20
Not enough data
7.6
20
Not enough data
Execution & Analytics
7.9
21
Not enough data
7.4
21
Not enough data
7.5
21
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
BrowserStack and mabl are categorized as Load Testing Tools, Software Testing, Automation Testing, and AI Software Testing Tools
Unique Categories
BrowserStack is categorized as Test Management, Mobile App Testing, Digital Accessibility Platforms, and Digital Accessibility Tools
mabl has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
BrowserStack
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
mabl
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
22.8%
Information Technology and Services
20.3%
Financial Services
5.5%
Marketing and Advertising
4.0%
Retail
2.7%
Other
44.7%
Computer Software
30.6%
Leisure, Travel & Tourism
5.6%
Insurance
5.6%
Higher Education
5.6%
Computer & Network Security
5.6%
Other
47.2%
Discussions
What are the benefits of automating a test case?
7 Comments
DD
It helps to reduce the manual testing efforts which ultimately reduces the testing resource and budget.Read more
What can BrowserStack do?
4 Comments
TN
BrowserStack is a cloud-based web and mobile testing platform that enables users to test their websites and apps on real browsers and mobile devices. It...Read more
Which of the following features are supported by BrowserStack automate ?*?
4 Comments
DD
Web/App Automate
Read more
What does mabl do?
1 Comment
CS
Quick answer: Mabl allows you to automate repetitive manual tests. Long answer: Mabl allows you to take a task that you must test prior to each release and...Read more
Who uses mabl?
1 Comment
GG
Any company with a Software Quality Assurance department in need for functional test automation needs.
It can cover Web, Cross-browser, and API...Read more
Does mabl use Selenium?
1 Comment
GG
mabl does not use Selenium under the hood, it's mostly a combination of proprietary coding techniques and some Playwright libraries. Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
