Users report that Hexomatic excels in its "Diverse Extraction Points" feature, scoring 9.7, which allows for a wide range of data sources to be integrated seamlessly, while Browse AI, with a score of 9.3, offers solid extraction capabilities but may not match the breadth of Hexomatic's options.
Reviewers mention that Hexomatic's "Ease of Setup" is rated at 9.5, indicating a straightforward onboarding process, whereas Browse AI, with a slightly higher score of 9.7, is noted for its user-friendly setup that requires minimal technical knowledge.
G2 users highlight Hexomatic's "Quality of Support" with a score of 9.7, emphasizing responsive customer service and helpful resources, while Browse AI's support, rated at 9.2, is still commendable but may not be as consistently praised for responsiveness.
Users on G2 report that both products have similar scores in "Data Structuring" at 9.4, but reviewers say Hexomatic provides more intuitive tools for organizing data, making it easier for users to manipulate and analyze their datasets.
Reviewers mention that Hexomatic's "Data Cleaning" feature, rated at 8.2, could use improvement, as some users find it less effective compared to Browse AI's 8.3 rating, which is noted for its more robust cleaning capabilities.
Users say that while both platforms offer "Visualization" tools, Hexomatic's score of 9.3 indicates a more comprehensive suite of visualization options, whereas Browse AI's 8.7 suggests it may have fewer features or less flexibility in presenting data visually.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Browse AI
Free
Free
50 Credits
Scrape up to 500 rows of data across 2 websites every month.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.