Brinqa vs Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) overall.
Reviewers felt that Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) meets the needs of their business better than Brinqa.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) over Brinqa.
What is the best way to onboard new user/hire to leverage the Kenna tool to its fullest ?
1 Comment
SM
Andy - thanks for reaching out with this question. Customers have the option to engage with the Kenna CX team and related resources. We have developed an...Read more
Is there a way to sort by most recently changed asset scores?
1 Comment
SM
"Hi Matt. You are correct. You cannot sort directly on the last time that an asset score changed, but remember that Kenna is designed to pull you out of the...Read more
Training - is there training that I can take to be more efficient with this tool?
1 Comment
SM
Joe - Excellent question. Customers have the option to engage with their assigned CX team, and for those customers who have elected to have a lower touch...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.