Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Bright Security and GitLab 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (56.0% of reviews)
Small-Business (37.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Bright Security
Star Rating
(25)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (56.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Bright SecurityGitLab
Star Rating
(861)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about GitLabSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that GitLab excels in its Deployment Automation feature, scoring 9.0, which allows for seamless integration and continuous deployment processes. In contrast, Bright Security's score of 8.9 indicates it also performs well, but users mention that GitLab's automation capabilities are more robust and user-friendly.
- Reviewers mention that GitLab's API / Integrations score of 9.2 is a standout feature, providing extensive options for third-party integrations. Bright Security, with a score of 8.4, is noted for having fewer integration options, which can limit flexibility for users looking to customize their workflows.
- Users on G2 highlight GitLab's superior Static Code Analysis capabilities, scoring 9.1, which helps in identifying vulnerabilities early in the development process. Bright Security's score of 6.3 in this area has led reviewers to express concerns about its effectiveness in catching critical issues.
- Reviewers say that Bright Security shines in Quality of Support, with a score of 9.4, which users appreciate for its responsiveness and helpfulness. GitLab, while still strong at 8.5, has received feedback indicating that its support could be more accessible during peak times.
- Users report that GitLab's Task Management feature, scoring 8.8, is highly effective for team collaboration and project tracking. In comparison, Bright Security's similar feature scored 8.5, with users mentioning that it lacks some of the advanced functionalities found in GitLab.
- G2 users mention that Bright Security's False Positives score of 7.3 is a significant drawback, as it leads to unnecessary alerts that can overwhelm teams. GitLab, with a score of 9.2 in this area, is praised for its accuracy in detection, allowing teams to focus on genuine threats.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Bright Security
No pricing availableGitLab
No pricing availableFree Trial
Bright Security
No trial information availableGitLab
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.4
20
9.1
650
Ease of Use
8.6
20
8.7
652
Ease of Setup
8.4
17
8.6
213
Ease of Admin
9.2
12
8.6
170
Quality of Support
9.4
20
8.5
514
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.3
12
8.8
145
Product Direction (% positive)
9.4
20
8.7
617
Features by Category
Administration
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Risk Analysis
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.6
7
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Threat Protection
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Generative AI
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
8.7
122
Not enough data
8.9
130
Not enough data
8.6
122
Functionality
Not enough data
9.0
128
Not enough data
8.5
114
Not enough data
8.5
109
Not enough data
8.7
114
Not enough data
8.6
103
Processes
Not enough data
9.1
131
Not enough data
9.0
120
Not enough data
8.7
120
Administration
Not enough data
9.1
27
Not enough data
9.0
26
Analysis
Not enough data
8.6
25
Not enough data
8.9
26
Not enough data
9.1
26
Not enough data
8.8
24
Testing
Not enough data
8.8
26
Not enough data
8.7
25
Not enough data
9.1
25
Not enough data
8.8
25
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
8.4
23
Not enough data
8.7
23
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
8.4
17
9.2
24
8.2
16
8.8
23
Analysis
8.2
18
8.4
23
8.3
17
9.1
23
6.3
12
8.8
23
8.8
17
8.8
23
6.1
11
8.9
23
Testing
6.5
12
8.6
22
8.9
17
9.1
22
8.9
14
8.9
21
9.1
16
9.0
20
8.2
14
8.9
19
7.3
16
9.1
20
Administration
Not enough data
8.7
76
Not enough data
8.7
77
Not enough data
8.7
74
Not enough data
8.8
79
Automation
Not enough data
8.9
78
Not enough data
8.4
71
Not enough data
9.0
78
Not enough data
8.6
72
IT Management
Not enough data
8.7
73
Not enough data
8.8
73
Not enough data
8.6
70
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Network
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Application
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.8
210
Not enough data
9.0
212
Not enough data
8.7
204
Management
Not enough data
8.7
197
Not enough data
8.3
190
Not enough data
8.9
204
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
Not enough data
8.0
9
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.2
9
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
8.6
138
Not enough data
8.5
132
Not enough data
8.6
139
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
8.4
135
Not enough data
8.8
144
Not enough data
8.8
134
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
8.7
64
Not enough data
8.8
69
Not enough data
8.7
66
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
8.8
63
Not enough data
8.9
63
Not enough data
8.9
60
Management
Not enough data
8.7
140
Not enough data
8.8
145
Not enough data
8.5
133
Functionality
Not enough data
8.8
145
Not enough data
8.8
145
Not enough data
8.7
137
Processes
Not enough data
9.0
149
Not enough data
8.5
138
Not enough data
9.0
152
Functionality
Not enough data
8.9
223
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
208
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
202
|
Verified
Management
Not enough data
8.8
210
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
213
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
195
|
Verified
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
Not enough data
7.0
10
Not enough data
7.4
12
Not enough data
7.6
11
Not enough data
7.3
10
Not enough data
7.7
10
Documentation
Not enough data
8.8
114
Not enough data
8.6
110
Not enough data
8.3
110
Security
Not enough data
8.0
99
Not enough data
8.4
98
Not enough data
8.9
107
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Code Generation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Value Analysis
Not enough data
8.9
38
Not enough data
8.7
40
Not enough data
8.6
36
Not enough data
8.8
36
Value Management
Not enough data
8.9
38
Not enough data
8.7
40
Not enough data
8.8
39
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Bright Security and GitLab are categorized as Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Unique Categories
Bright Security is categorized as Vulnerability Scanner and Website Security
GitLab is categorized as Secure Code Review, DevOps Platforms, Value Stream Management, Software Composition Analysis, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Application Release Orchestration, Version Control Hosting, Peer Code Review, Continuous Delivery, Bug Tracking, Continuous Integration, and AI Code Generation
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Bright Security
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
GitLab
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer & Network Security
36.0%
Information Technology and Services
24.0%
Financial Services
8.0%
Banking
8.0%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
4.0%
Other
20.0%
Computer Software
33.5%
Information Technology and Services
24.1%
Internet
3.9%
Financial Services
3.4%
Telecommunications
2.3%
Other
32.8%
Alternatives
Discussions
Bright Security has no discussions with answers
Is GitLab paid?
5 Comments
PG
Yes, Gitlab is paid as it provides the flexibility to use all the features of the GitHub and Git as well as the freedom to use your own DataBase so that you...Read more
Is GitLab free software?
4 Comments
RB
Yes, in that for non-commercial users, payment is unnecessary. Additionally, its source is publicly available.Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
