Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Box2D and PhysX 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (81.8% of reviews)
Mid-Market (62.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Box2D
Star Rating
(11)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (81.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Box2DPhysX
Star Rating
(37)3.9 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (62.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about PhysXSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Box2D excels in its ease of use, with a score of 6.7, making it a preferred choice for small businesses looking for straightforward physics simulation. In contrast, PhysX, with a score of 7.8, is noted for its more complex setup, which may be better suited for mid-market applications.
- Reviewers mention that Box2D has a strong community support system, reflected in its quality of support rating of 7.0. However, users on G2 highlight that PhysX offers superior support with a rating of 8.0, indicating a more responsive and helpful customer service experience.
- G2 users indicate that Box2D has a higher overall satisfaction rating with a G2 score of 4.4, while PhysX has a lower rating of 3.9. This suggests that Box2D may provide a more favorable user experience overall, particularly for smaller projects.
- Users say that Box2D is particularly effective for 2D physics simulations, which is a significant advantage for developers focused on simpler game mechanics. Conversely, reviewers mention that PhysX shines in 3D physics simulations, making it a better fit for more complex gaming environments.
- Reviewers mention that Box2D's product direction is viewed positively, although specific metrics are not provided. In contrast, PhysX has a product direction score of 7.3, indicating a more defined roadmap that may appeal to users looking for long-term viability.
- Users report that Box2D is favored for its lightweight nature and ease of integration into existing projects, while PhysX is recognized for its advanced features like real-time collision detection and support for complex physics interactions, which may be more beneficial for larger-scale applications.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Box2D
No pricing availablePhysX
No pricing availableFree Trial
Box2D
No trial information availablePhysX
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.9
6
7.9
35
Ease of Use
6.7
6
7.8
35
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
7.0
5
8.0
32
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
Not enough data
7.3
35
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Box2D and PhysX are categorized as Physics Engine
Unique Categories
Box2D has no unique categories
PhysX has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Box2D
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
PhysX
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Games
54.5%
E-Learning
18.2%
Marketing and Advertising
9.1%
Information Technology and Services
9.1%
Design
9.1%
Other
0.0%
Computer Software
67.6%
Computer Games
5.4%
Animation
5.4%
Recreational Facilities and Services
2.7%
Oil & Energy
2.7%
Other
16.2%
Discussions
Box2D has no discussions with answers
PhysX has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
