Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare BoardEffect and OnBoard Board Management Software

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
BoardEffect
BoardEffect
Star Rating
(285)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (45.9% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about BoardEffect
OnBoard Board Management Software
OnBoard Board Management Software
Star Rating
(639)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (47.4% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about OnBoard Board Management Software
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that OnBoard Board Management Software excels in its Quality of Support with a score of 9.6, while BoardEffect's support is rated at 9.1. Reviewers mention that OnBoard's support team is responsive and knowledgeable, making it easier to resolve issues quickly.
  • Reviewers mention that OnBoard's Agenda Builder feature, scoring 9.2, is intuitive and user-friendly, allowing for seamless meeting preparation. In contrast, BoardEffect's Agenda Builder scores lower at 8.1, with users noting it lacks some advanced customization options.
  • Users on G2 highlight OnBoard's superior Document Management capabilities, scoring 9.2 compared to BoardEffect's 8.9. Reviewers say that OnBoard provides a more organized and efficient way to manage documents, making it easier to find and share important files.
  • Reviewers mention that OnBoard's Ease of Use is rated at 9.3, significantly higher than BoardEffect's 8.7. Users report that OnBoard's interface is clean and straightforward, which reduces the learning curve for new users.
  • Users say that OnBoard's Meeting Minutes feature, with a score of 8.3, is more effective than BoardEffect's 6.6. Reviewers appreciate the ability to easily capture and distribute minutes, while BoardEffect users express frustration with its limitations in this area.
  • G2 users report that OnBoard's Product Direction is highly rated at 9.7, indicating a strong commitment to continuous improvement and innovation. In contrast, BoardEffect's score of 8.6 suggests that users feel less confident about the future development of the product.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
BoardEffect
No pricing available
OnBoard Board Management Software
No pricing available
Free Trial
BoardEffect
No trial information available
OnBoard Board Management Software
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.8
257
9.3
544
Ease of Use
8.7
265
9.3
549
Ease of Setup
8.8
232
9.3
498
Ease of Admin
8.8
228
9.3
507
Quality of Support
9.1
248
9.6
537
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
221
9.5
505
Product Direction (% positive)
8.6
257
9.6
543
Features by Category
7.0
237
7.8
375
Meeting Management
7.7
223
8.8
355
8.0
227
9.2
366
6.5
213
8.3
319
8.9
223
9.2
368
7.5
212
8.4
304
7.6
216
8.0
299
6.8
205
7.7
281
Board Tools
6.4
209
8.0
278
8.0
215
8.8
332
7.4
210
8.3
312
6.9
212
7.8
295
8.6
222
9.2
345
7.6
209
8.6
258
6.2
199
7.6
224
6.8
200
7.6
236
7.4
206
8.2
278
6.3
192
7.5
222
7.6
58
7.8
115
7.1
59
7.8
113
6.4
58
7.3
114
Generative AI - Board Management
5.9
56
6.4
108
Agentic AI - Board Management
4.9
15
5.8
11
5.1
15
5.6
11
5.2
15
5.6
11
6.1
13
Not enough data
Pre-Meeting Tools
8.2
13
Not enough data
7.2
13
Not enough data
7.9
12
Not enough data
Meeting Tools
4.4
9
Not enough data
6.9
12
Not enough data
7.2
12
Not enough data
5.9
9
Not enough data
Post-Meeting Tools
5.0
9
Not enough data
7.7
10
Not enough data
5.3
10
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Meeting Management
4.2
8
Not enough data
5.6
8
Not enough data
4.2
8
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
BoardEffect
BoardEffect
OnBoard Board Management Software
OnBoard Board Management Software
BoardEffect and OnBoard Board Management Software are categorized as Board Management
Unique Categories
BoardEffect
BoardEffect is categorized as Meeting Management
OnBoard Board Management Software
OnBoard Board Management Software has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
BoardEffect
BoardEffect
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
40.5%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
45.9%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
13.6%
OnBoard Board Management Software
OnBoard Board Management Software
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
45.8%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
47.4%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
6.9%
Reviewers' Industry
BoardEffect
BoardEffect
Non-Profit Organization Management
31.5%
Hospital & Health Care
13.3%
Higher Education
7.9%
Financial Services
3.9%
Education Management
3.9%
Other
39.4%
OnBoard Board Management Software
OnBoard Board Management Software
Non-Profit Organization Management
25.5%
Higher Education
14.7%
Banking
12.0%
Financial Services
6.9%
Education Management
6.4%
Other
34.6%
Alternatives
BoardEffect
BoardEffect Alternatives
Boardable
Boardable
Add Boardable
Convene
Convene
Add Convene
Nasdaq Boardvantage
Nasdaq Boardvantage
Add Nasdaq Boardvantage
BoardPro
BoardPro
Add BoardPro
OnBoard Board Management Software
OnBoard Board Management Software Alternatives
Diligent Boards
Diligent Boards
Add Diligent Boards
BoardPro
BoardPro
Add BoardPro
Convene
Convene
Add Convene
Boardable
Boardable
Add Boardable
Discussions
BoardEffect
BoardEffect Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
BoardEffect has no discussions with answers
OnBoard Board Management Software
OnBoard Board Management Software Discussions
Our board book is comprised of various file types. Does OnBoard support that?
2 Comments
Official Response from OnBoard Board Management Software
Every Microsoft file type can be uploaded and instantly incorporated within a board book. Same with PDFs, video links, web links, and more. OnBoard...Read more
Does anyone else think examples of the dashboard setups with other organizations would be helpful?
2 Comments
Shonda W.
SW
I'm worried about adoption, will my older board members actually use OnBoard?
1 Comment
Official Response from OnBoard Board Management Software
OnBoard was created because of this core challenge, and we’ve spent years refining the product with input from directors of all ages and technology...Read more