Compare Bluefish and PSPad 
Bluefish vs PSPad
- Users report that PSPad excels in its syntax highlighting feature, scoring 8.0, but reviewers mention that Bluefish outperforms it with a score of 9.0, making it a better choice for those who prioritize code readability.
- Reviewers mention that while both PSPad and Bluefish offer autocompletion, Bluefish has a slight edge with a score of 8.8 compared to PSPad's 8.3, indicating a more robust feature for speeding up coding tasks.
- Users on G2 highlight that both products have strong find and replace functionalities, each scoring 9.1, but PSPad is noted for its user-friendly interface that simplifies this process.
- G2 users report that Bluefish shines in code folding with a score of 8.9, while PSPad's score of 7.9 suggests it may not be as effective for users who need to manage large codebases efficiently.
- Reviewers mention that PSPad's collaborative editing feature scores 7.4, which is lower than Bluefish's 8.3, indicating that Bluefish may be a better option for teams working on shared projects.
- Users say that both products support a wide range of programming languages, with PSPad scoring 9.3 and Bluefish at 9.1, but PSPad is often praised for its extensive language support, making it a versatile choice for developers.
I like that as a business we work with a designer to create custom websites and html that cater to our individual needs and style.
There aren't enough features. The dealbreaker for me was the ability to sync local files to my server.
What i like the most about this text editor is, in first place, the possibility to put on it my own macros. And also, i love that it has his own navegator integrated. The chance to edit stuff directly from an FTP also is relly helpful for what i use this for
hangs, looping, error when replacing hex data (20 to 09 hex ), has not a search text on macro. Using Edit-Selection Type-Column Selection do not work. My version is 5.0.7 (775)
I like that as a business we work with a designer to create custom websites and html that cater to our individual needs and style.
What i like the most about this text editor is, in first place, the possibility to put on it my own macros. And also, i love that it has his own navegator integrated. The chance to edit stuff directly from an FTP also is relly helpful for what i use this for
There aren't enough features. The dealbreaker for me was the ability to sync local files to my server.
hangs, looping, error when replacing hex data (20 to 09 hex ), has not a search text on macro. Using Edit-Selection Type-Column Selection do not work. My version is 5.0.7 (775)
