Users report that Notepad++ excels in its syntax highlighting feature, scoring 9.1, which allows for clear differentiation of code elements, while Bluefish, with a score of 9.0, also offers robust syntax highlighting but is slightly less favored.
Reviewers mention that Notepad++ has a strong autocompletion feature with a score of 8.3, but Bluefish outshines it with a score of 8.8, making it more efficient for users who rely on quick code suggestions.
G2 users highlight that Notepad++ provides a superior find and replace functionality, scoring 9.3, which is particularly useful for large codebases, whereas Bluefish's score of 9.1 indicates it is still effective but not as powerful.
Users on G2 report that Bluefish offers better cross-platform support with a score of 9.3, making it a more versatile choice for developers working across different operating systems, compared to Notepad++'s score of 8.2.
Reviewers mention that Notepad++ has a more user-friendly ease of setup with a score of 9.5, which is beneficial for new users, while Bluefish's score of 8.1 suggests a steeper learning curve.
Users say that Notepad++ is a better partner in business with a score of 8.9, reflecting its reliability and community support, while Bluefish, with a score of 8.1, is seen as less consistent in this regard.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Bluefish
No pricing available
Notepad++
No pricing available
Free Trial
Bluefish
No trial information available
Notepad++
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.2
42
9.2
2,046
Ease of Use
8.5
42
9.3
2,056
Ease of Setup
8.3
9
9.5
377
Ease of Admin
7.8
6
9.2
283
Quality of Support
8.2
42
8.5
1,502
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.