Users report that Bluefish excels in syntax highlighting with a score of 9.0, making it easier for developers to read and understand code, while jEdit, with a score of 8.6, is noted for its decent but less vibrant highlighting capabilities.
Reviewers mention that jEdit shines in autocompletion, scoring 9.3 compared to Bluefish's 8.8, which helps streamline coding by suggesting code completions, thus enhancing productivity.
G2 users highlight Bluefish's superior find and replace functionality, scoring 9.1, which is particularly useful for large projects, while jEdit's score of 8.9 indicates it is effective but not as robust.
Users on G2 report that Bluefish offers better collaborative editing features with a score of 8.3, allowing teams to work together more effectively, whereas jEdit's score of 7.9 suggests it may lack some collaborative tools.
Reviewers mention that Bluefish's extensibility is a strong point with a score of 8.9, allowing users to customize their experience, while jEdit's lower score of 7.7 indicates it may have limitations in this area.
Users say that Bluefish's cross-platform support is impressive with a score of 9.3, making it accessible on various operating systems, while jEdit, with a score of 8.8, is also cross-platform but may not perform as seamlessly across all platforms.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Bluefish
No pricing available
jEdit
No pricing available
Free Trial
Bluefish
No trial information available
jEdit
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.2
42
9.3
12
Ease of Use
8.5
42
9.6
12
Ease of Setup
8.3
9
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
7.8
6
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.2
42
8.3
9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.