Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Bluefish and GNU Emacs 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Anima
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (68.8% of reviews)
Small-Business (45.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Bluefish
Star Rating
(51)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (68.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about BluefishGNU Emacs
Star Rating
(83)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about GNU EmacsSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that GNU Emacs excels in extensibility with a score of 9.5, allowing for deep customization through its powerful Lisp-based scripting capabilities, while Bluefish, with a score of 8.9, offers a more straightforward approach to customization that may not satisfy advanced users looking for extensive modifications.
- Reviewers mention that GNU Emacs has a steep learning curve, reflected in its ease of use score of 6.1, which can be daunting for beginners. In contrast, Bluefish is praised for its user-friendly interface, achieving a score of 8.5, making it more accessible for new users.
- G2 users highlight that both products offer robust syntax highlighting and autocompletion features, scoring equally at 9.0 and 8.8 respectively, but users on G2 note that Bluefish's find and replace functionality is slightly superior, with a score of 9.1 compared to Emacs' 9.0.
- Reviewers mention that Bluefish shines in collaborative editing with a score of 8.3, making it easier for teams to work together on projects, while GNU Emacs lacks this feature, which can be a significant drawback for collaborative environments.
- Users say that GNU Emacs provides excellent cross-platform support with a score of 9.0, allowing it to run on various operating systems seamlessly, whereas Bluefish, with a score of 9.3, also supports multiple platforms but is often noted for its more consistent performance across them.
- Users report that the quality of support for Bluefish, scoring 8.3, is generally better than that of GNU Emacs, which has a support score of 7.9, indicating that users may find more responsive assistance and resources when using Bluefish.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Bluefish
No pricing availableGNU Emacs
No pricing availableFree Trial
Bluefish
No trial information availableGNU Emacs
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.2
42
9.2
74
Ease of Use
8.5
42
6.1
75
Ease of Setup
8.3
9
5.5
17
Ease of Admin
7.8
6
6.8
16
Quality of Support
8.2
42
7.9
59
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.1
8
7.8
9
Product Direction (% positive)
8.6
43
7.9
72
Features by Category
Coding
8.9
16
9.0
7
8.8
15
8.8
7
9.1
16
9.0
7
8.8
16
8.6
7
Editing
8.3
16
Not enough data
9.0
14
9.0
7
9.6
16
8.8
7
Functionality
8.8
16
9.5
7
9.3
12
9.0
7
8.7
15
8.9
6
8.0
5
8.0
5
Agentic AI - Landing Page Builders
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform Basics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform Additional Functionalities
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Web Design
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Bluefish
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
GNU Emacs
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Design
20.8%
Information Technology and Services
10.4%
Computer Software
10.4%
Marketing and Advertising
6.3%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
4.2%
Other
47.9%
Computer Software
31.3%
Information Technology and Services
18.1%
Research
7.2%
Internet
6.0%
Higher Education
6.0%
Other
31.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
Is Bluefish a good IDE?
1 Comment
RL
Yes I love bluefishRead more
Bluefish has no more discussions with answers
GNU Emacs has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
