Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform and OpenText Silk Performer

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform
BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform
Star Rating
(25)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (50.0% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform
OpenText Silk Performer
OpenText Silk Performer
Star Rating
(28)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (54.5% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Silk Performer
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform excels in its API Testing capabilities, allowing for seamless integration with various CI/CD tools, while OpenText Silk Performer is noted for its robust Stress Testing features that can handle extreme load scenarios effectively.
  • Reviewers mention that BlazeMeter offers a more user-friendly interface, reflected in its higher Ease of Use score of 8.0 compared to Silk Performer's 8.9, making it easier for teams to adopt and utilize the platform without extensive training.
  • G2 users highlight BlazeMeter's superior Reporting features, with a score of 9.1, which provides detailed insights and analytics, whereas OpenText Silk Performer, while strong, does not match this level of depth in reporting capabilities.
  • Users on G2 indicate that OpenText Silk Performer shines in Test Variety, offering a wider range of testing options, which is particularly beneficial for enterprises with diverse testing needs, while BlazeMeter is more focused on specific testing scenarios.
  • Reviewers mention that BlazeMeter's Customization options allow for tailored testing environments, which is a significant advantage for teams needing specific configurations, whereas Silk Performer is perceived as less flexible in this regard.
  • Users say that both platforms provide solid Quality of Support, but OpenText Silk Performer has a slight edge with a score of 8.2, as users report quicker response times and more comprehensive support resources compared to BlazeMeter's 8.1.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform
No pricing available
OpenText Silk Performer
No pricing available
Free Trial
BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform
Free Trial is available
OpenText Silk Performer
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.0
18
8.8
16
Ease of Use
8.4
18
8.9
16
Ease of Setup
8.9
11
8.5
10
Ease of Admin
8.6
6
8.5
10
Quality of Support
8.3
18
8.2
16
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.3
6
8.5
10
Product Direction (% positive)
8.8
19
9.2
14
Features by Category
8.6
13
Not enough data
Functionality
8.5
12
Not enough data
8.5
10
Not enough data
8.3
13
Not enough data
Reporting
9.2
13
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Service VirtualizationHide 7 FeaturesShow 7 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Usability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
API Construction
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
API Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Integration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform
BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform
OpenText Silk Performer
OpenText Silk Performer
BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform and OpenText Silk Performer are categorized as Load Testing Tools
Unique Categories
BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform
BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform is categorized as Software Testing, Automation Testing, Test Management, Service Virtualization, and API Management
OpenText Silk Performer
OpenText Silk Performer has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform
BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
12.5%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
50.0%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
37.5%
OpenText Silk Performer
OpenText Silk Performer
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
4.5%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
40.9%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
54.5%
Reviewers' Industry
BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform
BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform
Information Technology and Services
41.7%
Computer Software
25.0%
Consumer Goods
8.3%
Security and Investigations
4.2%
Publishing
4.2%
Other
16.7%
OpenText Silk Performer
OpenText Silk Performer
Information Technology and Services
18.2%
Banking
18.2%
Retail
9.1%
Computer Software
9.1%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
4.5%
Other
40.9%
Alternatives
BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform
BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform Alternatives
Apache JMeter
Apache JMeter
Add Apache JMeter
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
Add OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Add BrowserStack
Postman
Postman
Add Postman
OpenText Silk Performer
OpenText Silk Performer Alternatives
Apache JMeter
Apache JMeter
Add Apache JMeter
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Add BrowserStack
SOAPUI
SOAPUI
Add SOAPUI
LoadView
LoadView
Add LoadView
Discussions
BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform
BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform Discussions
What is BlazeMeter used for?
1 Comment
Official Response from BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform
BlazeMeter was designed and built by engineers who are passionate about open source. From mobile to mainframe, IDE or UI, bring teams together in a single...Read more
What is BlazeMeter performance testing?
1 Comment
Official Response from BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform
BlazeMeter was designed and built by engineers who are passionate about open source. From mobile to mainframe, IDE or UI, bring teams together in a single...Read more
What is the difference between JMeter and BlazeMeter?
1 Comment
Official Response from BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform
BlazeMeter is 'JMeter in the cloud'. This means it's not only 100% compatible with JMeter - but it also addresses its limitations like scalability, stability...Read more
OpenText Silk Performer
OpenText Silk Performer Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
OpenText Silk Performer has no discussions with answers