Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Bitsight and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Intruder
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Perimeter
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (72.9% of reviews)
Small-Business (43.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Bitsight
Star Rating
(70)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (72.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about BitsightMicrosoft Defender Vulnerability Management
Star Rating
(32)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Microsoft Defender Vulnerability ManagementSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Reviews say that Bitsight Cyber Risk Intelligence excels in its comprehensive risk assessment capabilities, with users highlighting the effectiveness of its risk scoring system, which provides clear insights into third-party vulnerabilities.
- Users report that Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management offers superior ease of administration, with many reviewers appreciating its seamless integration with existing Microsoft products, making it a preferred choice for small businesses.
- Reviewers mention that Bitsight's customer support is highly rated, with a score of 9.1, as users frequently commend the responsiveness and expertise of the support team, which is crucial for enterprise-level clients.
- G2 users indicate that Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management shines in ease of use, scoring 8.7, with many noting its intuitive interface that simplifies vulnerability management for smaller teams.
- Users on G2 highlight that Bitsight Cyber Risk Intelligence has a strong product direction, with a score of 9.2, as reviewers appreciate the regular updates and enhancements that align with evolving cybersecurity threats.
- Users report that while both products have similar scores for meeting requirements, Bitsight Cyber Risk Intelligence stands out with a higher score of 9.2, indicating a more robust feature set that meets the complex needs of enterprise users.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Bitsight
No pricing availableMicrosoft Defender Vulnerability Management
No pricing availableFree Trial
Bitsight
No trial information availableMicrosoft Defender Vulnerability Management
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
55
8.5
29
Ease of Use
8.5
56
8.7
29
Ease of Setup
8.6
36
8.2
13
Ease of Admin
8.8
34
9.0
13
Quality of Support
9.3
55
8.8
28
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.3
35
8.6
14
Product Direction (% positive)
9.1
52
9.2
31
Features by Category
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Network
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Risk Analysis
8.7
13
8.9
24
7.2
13
8.7
24
7.7
13
8.8
23
Vulnerability Assesment
6.9
13
8.7
24
7.2
13
8.8
23
7.3
13
8.6
22
7.4
13
8.7
23
Automation
5.8
13
8.4
22
5.7
12
8.5
21
5.1
12
8.6
23
5.1
12
8.8
20
Functionality
8.1
24
Not enough data
8.0
25
Not enough data
7.6
26
Not enough data
8.7
25
Not enough data
Risk assessment
8.6
28
Not enough data
7.7
24
Not enough data
8.5
28
Not enough data
6.7
13
Not enough data
Generative AI - Vendor Security and Privacy Assessment
6.1
12
Not enough data
5.7
12
Not enough data
Asset Management
8.1
8
Not enough data
6.7
7
Not enough data
5.7
7
Not enough data
Monitoring
7.9
7
Not enough data
8.1
7
Not enough data
8.8
8
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
Risk Management
7.9
7
Not enough data
7.9
7
Not enough data
6.9
7
Not enough data
7.6
7
Not enough data
Generative AI
4.8
7
Not enough data
Risk Assessment
8.2
28
Not enough data
7.5
14
Not enough data
Risk Control
8.2
26
Not enough data
7.9
26
Not enough data
8.0
25
Not enough data
Monitoring
8.1
25
Not enough data
8.7
26
Not enough data
8.7
26
Not enough data
Reporting
8.2
24
Not enough data
7.5
24
Not enough data
8.3
24
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Third Party & Supplier Risk Management
6.7
13
Not enough data
7.1
14
Not enough data
Digital Risk Protection (DRP) PlatformsHide 12 FeaturesShow 12 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Vulnerability Management - Digital Risk Protection (DRP) Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Incident Response Digital Risk Protection (DRP) Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting and Analytics - Digital Risk Protection (DRP) Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI - Exposure Management Platforms
6.4
6
Not enough data
7.2
6
Not enough data
Risk Identification and Assessment - Exposure Management Platforms
8.3
6
Not enough data
8.1
6
Not enough data
Monitoring and Integration - Exposure Management Platforms
8.3
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
Orchestration
8.9
9
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
7.6
9
Not enough data
Information
9.3
9
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
Personalization
7.5
8
Not enough data
8.5
8
Not enough data
7.1
8
Not enough data
Generative AI
6.7
8
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Threat Intelligence
6.7
8
Not enough data
7.1
8
Not enough data
6.9
8
Not enough data
6.9
8
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Bitsight and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management are categorized as Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
Unique Categories
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is categorized as Vulnerability Scanner
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Bitsight
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
11.4%
Hospital & Health Care
11.4%
Financial Services
7.1%
Banking
7.1%
Computer Software
5.7%
Other
57.1%
Computer & Network Security
15.6%
Information Technology and Services
12.5%
Retail
6.3%
Hospital & Health Care
6.3%
Higher Education
6.3%
Other
53.1%
Alternatives
Discussions
Bitsight has no discussions with answers
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
