Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare BeEF and ZAP by Checkmarx 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Intruder
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (63.6% of reviews)
Small-Business (75.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free
BeEF
Star Rating
(12)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (63.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about BeEFZAP by Checkmarx
Star Rating
(12)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (75.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Learn more about ZAP by CheckmarxSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that BeEF excels in its Reconnaissance capabilities, scoring 9.0, which allows for effective gathering of information about target systems. In contrast, ZAP by Checkmarx has a lower score of 8.2 in this area, indicating it may not be as robust for initial data collection.
- Reviewers mention that BeEF's Vulnerability Scan feature is highly rated at 9.4, showcasing its effectiveness in identifying security weaknesses. ZAP by Checkmarx, while still competent, has a lower score in this category, which may affect users looking for thorough vulnerability assessments.
- G2 users highlight that BeEF's Extensibility is rated at 8.6, allowing for significant customization and integration with other tools. ZAP by Checkmarx, with a slightly higher score of 8.8, also offers good extensibility, but users may find BeEF's options more user-friendly.
- Users on G2 report that ZAP by Checkmarx shines in Test Automation, scoring 8.6, which is beneficial for teams looking to streamline their testing processes. BeEF, with a score of 8.3, is still effective but may not offer the same level of automation efficiency.
- Reviewers mention that BeEF's Quality of Support is rated at 7.0, which some users find lacking compared to ZAP by Checkmarx's score of 8.1. This difference may influence users who prioritize strong customer support in their software choices.
- Users say that ZAP by Checkmarx has a higher Performance and Reliability score of 8.9, indicating a more stable and dependable experience. BeEF, with a score of 8.0, may not perform as consistently, which could be a concern for users relying on uninterrupted service.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
BeEF
No pricing availableFree Trial
BeEF
No trial information availableZAP by Checkmarx
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.0
7
9.6
12
Ease of Use
7.9
7
9.0
12
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
7.0
5
8.1
12
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.1
6
10.0
11
Features by Category
Administration
7.7
5
8.3
12
8.6
6
8.8
12
9.0
5
8.8
12
Analysis
Not enough data
8.1
12
9.0
5
8.2
12
Not enough data
9.4
12
Testing
8.3
5
7.6
12
7.3
5
7.5
12
8.3
5
8.6
12
8.0
5
8.9
12
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)Hide 13 FeaturesShow 13 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
BeEF and ZAP by Checkmarx are categorized as Penetration Testing
Unique Categories
BeEF has no unique categories
ZAP by Checkmarx is categorized as Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
BeEF
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
ZAP by Checkmarx
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Professional Training & Coaching
18.2%
Computer & Network Security
18.2%
Logistics and Supply Chain
9.1%
Internet
9.1%
Insurance
9.1%
Other
36.4%
Computer & Network Security
41.7%
Information Technology and Services
25.0%
Computer Software
16.7%
Internet
8.3%
Hospital & Health Care
8.3%
Other
0.0%
Discussions
Can BeEF be used by hackers?
1 Comment
MF
Yes, ofcourseRead more
BeEF has no more discussions with answers
ZAP by Checkmarx has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
