Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Beanstalk and GitHub 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Codemagic
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (43.5% of reviews)
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$15 per month
$0.00 1 users
Beanstalk
Star Rating
(23)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (43.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
$15 per month
Browse all 4 pricing plansGitHub
Star Rating
(2,266)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that GitHub excels in its Integration capabilities, scoring 9.1, which allows seamless connections with various tools and services, enhancing workflow efficiency. In contrast, Beanstalk, while still strong with a score of 9.2, is noted for its Extensibility features, enabling users to customize their experience more deeply.
- Reviewers mention that GitHub's Deployment-Ready Staging feature, rated at 9.0, provides a robust environment for testing before going live, which is crucial for maintaining code quality. Beanstalk, however, shines in Continuous Deployment with a perfect score of 9.0, making it easier for teams to push updates quickly and efficiently.
- G2 users highlight GitHub's Task Management capabilities, scoring 8.9, which helps teams organize and prioritize their work effectively. Beanstalk, on the other hand, is praised for its Processes and Workflow management, also scoring 9.0, allowing for streamlined operations and better team collaboration.
- Users on G2 report that GitHub's Quality of Support is rated at 8.7, indicating a solid support system, but Beanstalk outperforms with a score of 10.0, suggesting that users feel exceptionally supported in their endeavors.
- Reviewers say that GitHub's API / Integrations score of 8.8 reflects its strong capabilities in connecting with other software, but Beanstalk's score of 9.2 for Integrations indicates a more extensive range of compatible tools, which can be a deciding factor for teams relying on multiple platforms.
- Users report that GitHub's Documentation is rated at 8.7, providing helpful resources for users, while Beanstalk's Feedback feature, scoring 8.7, is noted for its effectiveness in gathering user input, which can lead to continuous improvement of the software.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitHub
Free for Individuals and Organizations
$0.00
1 users
Basics for teams and developers
- Unlimited public/private repositories
- Unlimited collaborators
- 2,000 Actions minutes/month (Free for public repositories)
Free Trial
Beanstalk
Free Trial is available
GitHub
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.8
20
9.3
1,963
Ease of Use
8.7
21
8.7
1,979
Ease of Setup
8.8
10
9.0
590
Ease of Admin
8.7
9
8.7
450
Quality of Support
8.8
16
8.8
1,570
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
10.0
7
8.9
386
Product Direction (% positive)
7.7
20
8.9
1,915
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
8.9
142
Not enough data
9.1
147
Not enough data
8.7
144
Functionality
Not enough data
8.9
145
Not enough data
8.6
134
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
9.0
147
Not enough data
8.3
133
Processes
Not enough data
9.1
146
Not enough data
8.8
144
Not enough data
8.7
142
Administration
Not enough data
9.2
48
Not enough data
9.0
47
Analysis
Not enough data
8.7
47
Not enough data
8.9
50
Not enough data
8.9
48
Not enough data
9.0
50
Testing
Not enough data
9.3
49
Not enough data
8.6
44
Not enough data
8.7
45
Not enough data
8.9
43
Not enough data
8.7
42
Not enough data
9.0
43
Not enough data
8.5
42
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
10.0
14
Administration
Not enough data
9.1
98
Not enough data
9.0
97
Not enough data
8.8
99
Not enough data
9.2
99
Automation
Not enough data
8.9
97
Not enough data
8.7
91
Not enough data
8.8
96
Not enough data
8.9
91
IT Management
Not enough data
9.0
99
Not enough data
9.0
91
Not enough data
8.9
89
Functionality
Not enough data
9.1
238
Not enough data
9.2
241
Not enough data
8.9
238
Management
Not enough data
9.0
236
Not enough data
8.5
231
Not enough data
9.0
239
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
Not enough data
9.4
29
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
9.0
29
Not enough data
9.2
30
Not enough data
9.2
29
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
8.9
191
Not enough data
8.9
188
Not enough data
9.0
192
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
8.5
186
Not enough data
8.9
196
Not enough data
9.0
184
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
9.5
26
Not enough data
9.4
26
Not enough data
9.3
26
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
8.9
74
Not enough data
9.1
79
Not enough data
9.2
78
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
8.9
76
Not enough data
9.1
78
Not enough data
8.9
76
Management
Not enough data
8.9
137
Not enough data
9.2
137
Not enough data
8.6
133
Functionality
Not enough data
8.8
135
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
8.7
134
Processes
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
8.8
134
Not enough data
9.1
138
Functionality
Not enough data
9.3
223
Not enough data
9.0
212
Not enough data
8.7
204
Management
Not enough data
8.9
217
Not enough data
8.9
213
Not enough data
8.3
208
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
9.0
33
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
8.5
33
Not enough data
8.8
33
Documentation
Not enough data
8.8
185
Not enough data
8.8
179
Not enough data
8.6
170
Security
Not enough data
8.3
167
Not enough data
8.6
168
Not enough data
9.0
177
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Beanstalk and GitHub are categorized as Peer Code Review and Version Control Hosting
Unique Categories
Beanstalk has no unique categories
GitHub is categorized as DevOps Platforms, Software Composition Analysis, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Application Release Orchestration, Continuous Delivery, Gaming Tools, Bug Tracking, Configuration Management, Continuous Integration, Build Automation, and Secure Code Review
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Beanstalk
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
GitHub
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Marketing and Advertising
21.7%
Internet
17.4%
Information Technology and Services
17.4%
Computer Software
17.4%
Newspapers
8.7%
Other
17.4%
Computer Software
31.7%
Information Technology and Services
22.7%
Internet
6.7%
Higher Education
3.4%
Financial Services
3.2%
Other
32.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
Beanstalk has no discussions with answers
What is GitHub used for?
8 Comments
MK
- store software source code
- use actions to execute CI / CD and publish artefacts / create releases
- lightweight software project managementRead more
What can GitHub be used for?
5 Comments
MS
It's a platform for version controlling. Where group of people collaborate each other and work on a single project. Read more
What does GitHub mean?
2 Comments
JV
It is a platform for doing projects based on serveral services like website development projects etcRead more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
