Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Base and UserEvidence

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Base
Base
Star Rating
(49)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (55.1% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Base
UserEvidence
UserEvidence
Star Rating
(40)4.9 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (56.8% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about UserEvidence
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that Base excels in its Content Creation Tools with a score of 9.2, allowing for robust content generation, while UserEvidence, although strong, does not match this level of functionality.
  • Reviewers mention that UserEvidence shines in Ease of Use with a score of 9.6, making it more user-friendly for new users compared to Base's score of 8.1, which some users find less intuitive.
  • G2 users highlight that UserEvidence offers superior Quality of Support, achieving a perfect score of 10.0, while Base's score of 8.9 indicates room for improvement in customer service responsiveness.
  • Users on G2 report that Base's Collaborative Editorial Calendars feature, scoring 8.1, is less effective than UserEvidence's planning tools, which are noted for their seamless integration and scheduling capabilities.
  • Reviewers say that UserEvidence's Mobile Optimization is a standout feature with a score of 8.7, allowing for better accessibility on mobile devices, whereas Base's score of 6.8 indicates significant limitations in this area.
  • Users mention that Base's Distribution Features score of 9.5 is impressive, but UserEvidence's overall content distribution capabilities, scoring 9.5 as well, are often praised for their ease of use and effectiveness in reaching target audiences.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Base
No pricing available
UserEvidence
No pricing available
Free Trial
Base
No trial information available
UserEvidence
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.2
38
9.2
29
Ease of Use
7.9
38
9.6
28
Ease of Setup
7.8
30
9.7
15
Ease of Admin
8.1
30
9.5
14
Quality of Support
8.7
38
10.0
28
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
31
10.0
15
Product Direction (% positive)
9.0
36
10.0
29
Features by Category
Not enough data
Not enough data
Content Creation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Optimization
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Logistics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
User-Generated ContentHide 12 FeaturesShow 12 Features
8.0
9
Not enough data
Visual UGC
7.7
5
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integrations
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.1
7
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
8.6
7
Not enough data
7.5
6
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
7.5
16
Planning
Not enough data
Not enough data
Publishing
Not enough data
7.7
5
Social Media
Not enough data
Not enough data
Planning
Not enough data
8.1
9
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
6.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Content Creation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Customer Advocacy
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Content DistributionHide 7 FeaturesShow 7 Features
Not enough data
8.1
16
Agentic AI - Content Distribution
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Planning
Not enough data
8.1
9
Online Community ManagementHide 27 FeaturesShow 27 Features
7.7
10
Not enough data
Community Building
7.5
8
Not enough data
8.5
9
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
6.3
5
Not enough data
Community Improvement
7.5
6
Not enough data
7.2
6
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Customer Analytics
7.2
6
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Community Management
7.3
5
Not enough data
8.1
7
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Community Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Online Community Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Discovery
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Insight
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Mobile
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Base
Base
UserEvidence
UserEvidence
Base and UserEvidence are categorized as Customer Advocacy
Unique Categories
UserEvidence
UserEvidence is categorized as Content Distribution and Content Creation
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Base
Base
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
10.2%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
34.7%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
55.1%
UserEvidence
UserEvidence
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
32.4%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
56.8%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
10.8%
Reviewers' Industry
Base
Base
Computer Software
40.8%
Information Technology and Services
30.6%
Computer & Network Security
10.2%
Real Estate
4.1%
E-Learning
4.1%
Other
10.2%
UserEvidence
UserEvidence
Computer Software
64.9%
Information Technology and Services
13.5%
Marketing and Advertising
8.1%
Real Estate
2.7%
Internet
2.7%
Other
8.1%
Alternatives
Base
Base Alternatives
Influitive
Influitive
Add Influitive
Higher Logic Thrive
Higher Logic Thrive
Add Higher Logic Thrive
Birdeye
Birdeye
Add Birdeye
NiceJob
NiceJob
Add NiceJob
UserEvidence
UserEvidence Alternatives
Influitive
Influitive
Add Influitive
Semrush
Semrush
Add Semrush
Birdeye
Birdeye
Add Birdeye
Bynder
Bynder
Add Bynder
Discussions
Base
Base Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Base has no discussions with answers
UserEvidence
UserEvidence Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
UserEvidence has no discussions with answers