Users report that Barracuda Web Application Firewall excels in "Website Protection" with a score of 9.3, providing robust defenses against various web threats, while HAProxy, although strong, has a slightly lower score of 9.1 in "Traffic Control," indicating it may not be as comprehensive in web-specific protections.
Reviewers mention that Barracuda's "Quality of Support" is rated at 8.3, which some users find lacking compared to HAProxy's impressive score of 9.0, suggesting that HAProxy may offer more responsive and effective customer service.
G2 users highlight Barracuda's "Logging and Reporting" capabilities with a score of 8.7, which some find useful for compliance and monitoring, whereas HAProxy's "API Monitoring" feature, rated at 8.6, is noted for its effectiveness in tracking API performance, indicating a different focus in reporting functionalities.
Users on G2 report that Barracuda shines in "Data Security" with a score of 8.5, emphasizing its strong encryption and protection measures, while HAProxy's "Scalability" is rated higher at 9.2, suggesting it may handle larger traffic loads more efficiently.
Reviewers mention that Barracuda's "Application-Layer Controls" score of 9.0 is a strong point, providing detailed control over application traffic, while HAProxy's "Network Controls" also scores 9.1, indicating a slight edge in managing network-level traffic.
Users say that Barracuda's "Attack Mitigation" feature is rated at 9.0, which is praised for its proactive defense mechanisms, while HAProxy's "Performance and Reliability" score of 9.6 is highlighted by users as a key strength, suggesting it may offer superior uptime and speed under load.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.