When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Balto easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Balto overall.
Balto and Playvox Quality Management both meet the requirements of our reviewers at a comparable rate.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, Balto and Playvox Quality Management provide similar levels of assistance.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Balto over Playvox Quality Management.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Balto
No pricing available
Playvox Quality Management
No pricing available
Free Trial
Balto
No trial information available
Playvox Quality Management
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.5
409
9.5
903
Ease of Use
9.6
412
9.5
913
Ease of Setup
9.6
221
9.5
371
Ease of Admin
9.5
119
9.3
208
Quality of Support
9.6
397
9.6
829
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Has there been any thought of Balto in a higher-education context ?
2 Comments
MB
Hi Adonis!
Great idea. We've actually looked into using Balto for alumni relations teams to help universities fundraise and keep their alumni engaged. I...Read more
Can we make it capture keywords faster so it can keep up with our screen pops?
During our Free Trial you will access all our Professional Plan features. However, if you want to try out specific features that are not included in that...Read more
Do you charge per user or per agent?
1 Comment
Official Response from Playvox Quality Management
At Playvox we charge you per user/per month as we offer 4 different roles: Administrator, QA Analyst, Team Leader and Agent. Depending on the role, each user...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.