When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Cohesity easier to use, set up, and administer. However, reviewers preferred doing business with Bacula Enterprise overall.
Reviewers felt that Bacula Enterprise meets the needs of their business better than Cohesity.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Bacula Enterprise is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Cohesity over Bacula Enterprise.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Bacula Enterprise
No pricing available
Cohesity
No pricing available
Free Trial
Bacula Enterprise
No trial information available
Cohesity
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.5
43
8.7
41
Ease of Use
8.8
43
9.1
41
Ease of Setup
7.7
37
8.8
38
Ease of Admin
8.4
38
8.9
37
Quality of Support
9.8
42
9.0
41
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
can we use baculam for adding a mutiple jobs concurrently?
2 Comments
RM
Hello Bhupesh,
The Bacula Enterprise doesn't support Baculum because it instead uses BWeb. If you are a BEE user, you should use BWeb which is more...Read more
Who else has had problems with Bacula support telling them "You're the only customer reporting this, nobody else has this problem" foe svereal years before confirming a fault but then declining to fix it?
1 Comment
GG
That is ugly indeed! The only thing I can advise you, and have good experience with, is to escalate the ticket as soon as you're unhappy with the support...Read more
Bacula Enterprise has no more discussions with answers
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
Your software and services insights are valuable.
Your peers come to G2 to get an inside look at and other business solutions. Adding perspective on will help others pick the right solution based on real user experience.