Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Backbone.js and Underscore.Js 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
High Digital
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (40.0% of reviews)
Small-Business (50.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Backbone.js
Star Rating
(37)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (40.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Backbone.jsUnderscore.Js
Star Rating
(14)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (50.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Underscore.JsSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Backbone.js has a solid library structure, with an 8.3 rating, but reviewers mention that Underscore.js outshines it with an 8.9 rating, particularly for its utility functions that simplify coding tasks.
- Reviewers mention that while Backbone.js has a community rating of 6.9, Underscore.js boasts a much higher community engagement score of 8.6, indicating a more active and supportive user base.
- G2 users highlight that Backbone.js offers decent browser support with a score of 8.1, but users on G2 praise Underscore.js for its superior browser compatibility, achieving a score of 9.0, which is crucial for modern web applications.
- Users say that the ease of use for both products is relatively close, with Backbone.js at 8.1 and Underscore.js at 8.3, but reviewers mention that Underscore.js provides a more intuitive experience, especially for beginners.
- Reviewers mention that Backbone.js has a lower product direction score of 5.9, indicating some concerns about its future development, while Underscore.js has a more positive outlook with a score of 8.2, suggesting a more robust roadmap ahead.
- Users report that while Backbone.js has a quality of support rating of 7.8, Underscore.js slightly edges it out with an 8.0, indicating that users may find more reliable assistance when using Underscore.js.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Backbone.js
No pricing availableUnderscore.Js
No pricing availableFree Trial
Backbone.js
No trial information availableUnderscore.Js
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
7.9
34
8.9
14
Ease of Use
8.1
34
8.3
14
Ease of Setup
8.8
13
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.1
13
Not enough data
Quality of Support
7.8
31
8.0
10
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.1
12
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
5.9
34
8.2
13
Features by Category
JavaScript Frameworks
8.3
9
8.9
6
6.9
7
8.6
7
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.1
9
9.0
7
5.8
6
Not enough data
7.9
8
8.0
5
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Backbone.js and Underscore.Js are categorized as JavaScript Web Frameworks
Unique Categories
Backbone.js has no unique categories
Underscore.Js has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Backbone.js
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Underscore.Js
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
22.9%
Information Technology and Services
17.1%
Internet
11.4%
Semiconductors
5.7%
Marketing and Advertising
5.7%
Other
37.1%
Information Technology and Services
28.6%
Computer Software
28.6%
Real Estate
7.1%
Hospital & Health Care
7.1%
Financial Services
7.1%
Other
21.4%
Alternatives
Discussions
Backbone.js has no discussions with answers
Underscore.Js has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
