Users report that HAProxy excels in performance and reliability, with a score of 9.6, making it a preferred choice for high-traffic applications. In contrast, Azure Web Application Firewall scores 8.8 in this area, indicating it may not handle heavy loads as efficiently.
Reviewers mention that HAProxy's extensibility is a standout feature, scoring 9.4, which allows for easy customization and integration with various systems. Azure Web Application Firewall, while still functional, scores lower at 8.6, suggesting it may have limitations in this regard.
G2 users highlight HAProxy's superior traffic control capabilities, scoring 9.1, which is crucial for managing large volumes of requests effectively. Azure Web Application Firewall, on the other hand, scores 8.1, indicating it may not provide the same level of control over traffic management.
Users on G2 report that HAProxy's API and integrations score highly at 9.2, making it easier to connect with other tools and services. Azure Web Application Firewall, while still functional, scores slightly lower at 9.0, suggesting it may not be as seamless in integration.
Reviewers say that HAProxy's logging and reporting features are robust, with a score of 8.8, allowing for better monitoring and troubleshooting. Azure Web Application Firewall scores 8.3, indicating it may not provide as comprehensive logging capabilities.
Users say that HAProxy's application-layer controls score 9.0, providing strong security measures at the application level. In comparison, Azure Web Application Firewall scores 7.9, suggesting it may not offer the same depth of application-layer security controls.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.