Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Azure Virtual Network and IBM Cloud Virtual Servers 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Cloudways
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Triton DataCenter
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Hostman
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (46.2% of reviews)
Enterprise (54.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Azure Virtual Network
Star Rating
(27)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (46.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Virtual NetworkIBM Cloud Virtual Servers
Star Rating
(55)3.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (54.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about IBM Cloud Virtual ServersSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that IBM Cloud Virtual Servers has a lower ease of setup score (7.5) compared to Azure Virtual Network (8.9), indicating that Azure may provide a more user-friendly onboarding experience.
- Reviewers mention that Azure Virtual Network excels in quality of support with a score of 8.7, while IBM Cloud Virtual Servers falls short at 7.2, suggesting that Azure users may have better access to assistance when needed.
- G2 users highlight that Azure Virtual Network has a significantly higher product direction score (9.7) compared to IBM Cloud Virtual Servers (6.2), indicating a stronger confidence in Azure's future development and feature enhancements.
- Users on G2 report that IBM Cloud Virtual Servers offers more flexibility in terms of custom VMs and bare metal options, which some users find beneficial for specific enterprise needs, while Azure Virtual Network focuses more on integrated networking solutions.
- Reviewers say that Azure Virtual Network's ease of use (9.0) is a standout feature, making it more appealing for teams looking for straightforward management, whereas IBM Cloud Virtual Servers' ease of admin score (7.3) suggests a steeper learning curve.
- Users mention that Azure Virtual Network's resource auto-scaling capabilities are more robust, allowing for better performance management during peak usage times, while IBM Cloud Virtual Servers may require more manual intervention to achieve similar results.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Azure Virtual Network
No pricing availableIBM Cloud Virtual Servers
No pricing availableFree Trial
Azure Virtual Network
No trial information availableIBM Cloud Virtual Servers
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.2
18
8.2
39
Ease of Use
8.8
19
8.1
38
Ease of Setup
9.0
14
7.5
21
Ease of Admin
8.6
12
7.3
20
Quality of Support
8.4
19
7.2
38
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
12
7.6
22
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
19
6.2
37
Features by Category
Customization
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Infrastructure
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Infrastructure Provision
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Virtual Private Servers (VPS)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Hosting Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Azure Virtual Network and IBM Cloud Virtual Servers are categorized as Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)
Unique Categories
Azure Virtual Network is categorized as VPS Hosting Platforms
IBM Cloud Virtual Servers is categorized as Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Azure Virtual Network
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
IBM Cloud Virtual Servers
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
26.9%
Computer Software
19.2%
Hospital & Health Care
7.7%
Computer Networking
7.7%
Telecommunications
3.8%
Other
34.6%
Information Technology and Services
15.2%
Financial Services
10.9%
Education Management
10.9%
Computer Software
8.7%
Internet
6.5%
Other
47.8%
Alternatives
Discussions
Azure Virtual Network has no discussions with answers
IBM Cloud Virtual Servers has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
