Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Azure Virtual Machines and XenServer 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Triton DataCenter
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Hostman
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (34.5% of reviews)
Enterprise (56.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Azure Virtual Machines
Star Rating
(385)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (34.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Virtual MachinesXenServer
Star Rating
(48)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (56.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about XenServerSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that XenServer excels in its Virtual Machines (VMs) performance with a score of 9.2, making it a strong choice for organizations that prioritize VM efficiency. In contrast, Azure Virtual Machines, while still robust, does not match this level of performance in the same category.
- Reviewers mention that Azure Virtual Machines offers superior scalability with a score of 8.6, which is crucial for businesses looking to grow without significant infrastructure changes. XenServer, while capable, does not provide the same level of scalability, which may limit its appeal for rapidly expanding enterprises.
- G2 users highlight the security features of Azure Virtual Machines, scoring 9.3, as a key differentiator. This includes advanced threat protection and compliance certifications that are particularly appealing to enterprises with stringent security requirements. XenServer, while secure, does not offer the same breadth of security features.
- Users on G2 report that Azure Virtual Machines provides better resource auto-scaling capabilities, scoring 8.9, which allows for dynamic adjustment of resources based on demand. XenServer's resource management features, while effective, do not match the flexibility and automation offered by Azure.
- Reviewers mention that the quality of support for Azure Virtual Machines is rated higher at 8.5 compared to XenServer's 8.1. This difference can significantly impact user experience, especially for organizations that require timely assistance and guidance.
- Users say that the ease of setup for both products is relatively comparable, with Azure Virtual Machines slightly ahead at 8.6 versus XenServer's 8.4. However, the overall user experience may vary based on specific organizational needs and existing infrastructure.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Azure Virtual Machines
No pricing availableXenServer
No pricing availableFree Trial
Azure Virtual Machines
No trial information availableXenServer
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
332
8.4
41
Ease of Use
8.6
332
8.5
41
Ease of Setup
8.6
198
8.4
23
Ease of Admin
8.6
190
8.8
23
Quality of Support
8.3
320
8.1
32
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
182
8.3
18
Product Direction (% positive)
9.2
320
6.9
42
Features by Category
Infrastructure Provision
9.0
60
Not enough data
8.6
55
Not enough data
9.0
52
Not enough data
7.2
48
Not enough data
8.3
53
Not enough data
9.3
58
Not enough data
8.5
48
Not enough data
9.1
56
Not enough data
Management
8.9
55
Not enough data
8.9
53
Not enough data
8.7
54
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
53
Not enough data
Performance
8.4
25
Not enough data
8.3
25
Not enough data
9.0
26
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
29
Not enough data
8.5
28
Not enough data
8.7
28
Not enough data
9.3
29
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Server Virtualization
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Azure Virtual Machines and XenServer are categorized as Server Virtualization
Unique Categories
Azure Virtual Machines is categorized as Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS)
XenServer has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Azure Virtual Machines
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
XenServer
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
29.8%
Computer Software
18.2%
Computer & Network Security
7.3%
Accounting
4.3%
Information Services
2.4%
Other
37.9%
Information Technology and Services
21.3%
Hospital & Health Care
14.9%
Higher Education
10.6%
Education Management
6.4%
Utilities
4.3%
Other
42.6%
Alternatives
Discussions
What are Azure virtual machines used for?
2 Comments
RL
Some use cases:
Application Hosting, Development and Testing, Data Processing and Analytics, Disaster Recovery, High-Performance Computing (HPC), Hybrid...Read more
XenServer has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
