Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Azure Virtual Machines and SQL Server on Virtual Machines 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Triton DataCenter
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Hostman
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (34.6% of reviews)
Enterprise (46.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Azure Virtual Machines
Star Rating
(384)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (34.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Virtual MachinesSQL Server on Virtual Machines
Star Rating
(18)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (46.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SQL Server on Virtual MachinesSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Azure Virtual Machines excels in scalability with a score of 8.6, allowing businesses to easily adjust resources based on demand, while SQL Server on Virtual Machines has a slightly lower scalability score, indicating it may not be as flexible in resource management.
- Reviewers mention that Azure Virtual Machines offers superior data recovery options, scoring 9.0, which is crucial for businesses that prioritize data integrity and quick recovery times. In contrast, SQL Server on Virtual Machines does not highlight this feature as strongly, leading to concerns about its recovery capabilities.
- G2 users highlight the ease of setup for Azure Virtual Machines, scoring 8.6, which is beneficial for teams looking to deploy quickly. SQL Server on Virtual Machines lacks a specific score for ease of setup, suggesting potential challenges in getting started.
- Reviewers say that Azure Virtual Machines provides robust security features, scoring 9.3, which is a significant advantage for organizations that handle sensitive data. SQL Server on Virtual Machines, while also secure, does not match this high rating, indicating it may not offer the same level of protection.
- Users on G2 report that Azure Virtual Machines has excellent resource auto-scaling capabilities, scoring 8.9, which allows for efficient resource management during peak usage times. SQL Server on Virtual Machines, however, does not emphasize this feature, which could lead to inefficiencies in resource allocation.
- Reviewers mention that Azure Virtual Machines has a strong public cloud rating of 8.9, making it a preferred choice for businesses looking to leverage cloud infrastructure. SQL Server on Virtual Machines, while effective, does not showcase the same level of public cloud integration, which may limit its appeal for cloud-first strategies.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Azure Virtual Machines
No pricing availableSQL Server on Virtual Machines
No pricing availableFree Trial
Azure Virtual Machines
No trial information availableSQL Server on Virtual Machines
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
331
8.5
9
Ease of Use
8.6
331
8.7
9
Ease of Setup
8.6
197
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.6
189
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.3
319
8.7
9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
181
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.2
319
8.7
9
Features by Category
Infrastructure Provision
9.0
59
Not enough data
8.6
54
Not enough data
9.0
51
Not enough data
7.2
48
Not enough data
8.3
52
Not enough data
9.2
57
Not enough data
8.5
48
Not enough data
9.1
55
Not enough data
Management
8.9
54
Not enough data
8.8
52
Not enough data
8.6
53
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
52
Not enough data
Performance
8.4
25
Not enough data
8.3
25
Not enough data
9.0
26
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
29
Not enough data
8.5
28
Not enough data
8.7
28
Not enough data
9.3
29
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Server Virtualization
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Azure Virtual Machines and SQL Server on Virtual Machines are categorized as Server Virtualization
Unique Categories
Azure Virtual Machines is categorized as Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS)
SQL Server on Virtual Machines has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Azure Virtual Machines
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SQL Server on Virtual Machines
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
29.6%
Computer Software
18.2%
Computer & Network Security
7.3%
Accounting
4.3%
Information Services
2.4%
Other
38.0%
Education Management
20.0%
Computer Software
20.0%
Information Technology and Services
13.3%
Financial Services
13.3%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
6.7%
Other
26.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
What are Azure virtual machines used for?
2 Comments
RL
Some use cases:
Application Hosting, Development and Testing, Data Processing and Analytics, Disaster Recovery, High-Performance Computing (HPC), Hybrid...Read more
SQL Server on Virtual Machines has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
