Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Azure Virtual Machines and IBM Cloud Virtual Servers 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Sangfor HCI
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Triton DataCenter
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (34.5% of reviews)
Enterprise (54.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Azure Virtual Machines
Star Rating
(385)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (34.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Virtual MachinesIBM Cloud Virtual Servers
Star Rating
(55)3.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (54.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about IBM Cloud Virtual ServersSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that IBM Cloud Virtual Servers excels in its hybrid cloud capabilities, with a score of 8.9, while Azure Virtual Machines also performs well in this area but slightly lower at 8.6. Reviewers mention that IBM's seamless integration with on-premises infrastructure is a significant advantage for enterprises looking for flexibility.
- Reviewers mention that Azure Virtual Machines has a superior ease of use rating of 8.7 compared to IBM's 8.1. Users on G2 highlight that Azure's user interface is more intuitive, making it easier for new users to navigate and manage their virtual environments.
- G2 users report that IBM Cloud Virtual Servers has a strong performance in data recovery, scoring 9.0, which is on par with Azure's performance. However, users say that IBM's automated backup features are particularly robust, providing peace of mind for businesses concerned about data loss.
- Users say that Azure Virtual Machines shines in scalability with a score of 8.6, while IBM Cloud Virtual Servers scores slightly lower at 8.2. Reviewers mention that Azure's ability to quickly scale resources up or down based on demand is a key feature that enhances operational efficiency.
- Reviewers mention that IBM Cloud Virtual Servers has a notable advantage in security, scoring 9.3 compared to Azure's 8.5. Users report that IBM's comprehensive security features, including advanced threat detection and compliance certifications, are highly valued by enterprises.
- Users on G2 report that Azure Virtual Machines offers better customization options for virtual machines, with a score of 9.2, while IBM's score is 8.9. Reviewers highlight Azure's extensive library of pre-configured templates and the flexibility to create custom VM configurations as significant benefits.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Azure Virtual Machines
No pricing availableIBM Cloud Virtual Servers
No pricing availableFree Trial
Azure Virtual Machines
No trial information availableIBM Cloud Virtual Servers
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
332
8.2
39
Ease of Use
8.6
332
8.1
38
Ease of Setup
8.6
198
7.5
21
Ease of Admin
8.6
190
7.3
20
Quality of Support
8.3
320
7.2
38
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
182
7.6
22
Product Direction (% positive)
9.2
320
6.2
37
Features by Category
Customization
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Infrastructure
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Infrastructure Provision
9.0
60
Not enough data
8.6
55
Not enough data
9.0
52
Not enough data
7.2
48
Not enough data
8.3
53
Not enough data
9.3
58
Not enough data
8.5
48
Not enough data
9.1
56
Not enough data
Management
8.9
55
Not enough data
8.9
53
Not enough data
8.7
54
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
53
Not enough data
Performance
8.4
25
Not enough data
8.3
25
Not enough data
9.0
26
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
29
Not enough data
8.5
28
Not enough data
8.7
28
Not enough data
9.3
29
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Server Virtualization
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Azure Virtual Machines and IBM Cloud Virtual Servers are categorized as Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS)
Unique Categories
Azure Virtual Machines is categorized as Server Virtualization
IBM Cloud Virtual Servers is categorized as Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Azure Virtual Machines
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
IBM Cloud Virtual Servers
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
29.8%
Computer Software
18.2%
Computer & Network Security
7.3%
Accounting
4.3%
Information Services
2.4%
Other
37.9%
Information Technology and Services
15.2%
Financial Services
10.9%
Education Management
10.9%
Computer Software
8.7%
Internet
6.5%
Other
47.8%
Alternatives
Discussions
What are Azure virtual machines used for?
2 Comments
RL
Some use cases:
Application Hosting, Development and Testing, Data Processing and Analytics, Disaster Recovery, High-Performance Computing (HPC), Hybrid...Read more
IBM Cloud Virtual Servers has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
