Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Azure Virtual Machines and Contabo 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Sangfor HCI
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (34.5% of reviews)
Small-Business (95.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Contact Us Per Month
Azure Virtual Machines
Star Rating
(385)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (34.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Virtual MachinesContabo
Star Rating
(20)2.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (95.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us Per Month
Learn more about ContaboSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Azure Virtual Machines excels in scalability with a score of 8.6, allowing businesses to easily adjust resources based on demand, while Contabo struggles in this area with a lower score, indicating potential limitations for growing businesses.
- Reviewers mention that Azure Virtual Machines offers superior security features, scoring 9.3, which includes robust encryption and access control, whereas Contabo's security tools received a lower score of 3.8, raising concerns about data protection.
- G2 users highlight the ease of use of Azure Virtual Machines, with a score of 8.7, making it more user-friendly for both technical and non-technical users, while Contabo's ease of use score of 5.5 suggests a steeper learning curve.
- Users on G2 appreciate Azure's performance management capabilities, scoring 8.8, which allows for better monitoring and optimization of resources, while Contabo's performance tracking features are less robust, scoring only 3.9.
- Reviewers say that Azure Virtual Machines provides excellent data recovery options, scoring 9.0, which is crucial for businesses that prioritize data integrity, while Contabo's offerings in this area are not as strong, leading to potential risks for users.
- Users report that Azure Virtual Machines has a more comprehensive infrastructure compatibility, scoring 8.9, which facilitates smoother integration with existing systems, while Contabo's interoperability features are less favorable, potentially complicating setups for users.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Azure Virtual Machines
No pricing availableContabo
Cloud VPS
Contact Us
Per Month
Fast & Flexible Cloud VPS Instances
- up to 24 vCPU Cores
- up to 120 GB RAM
- up to 600 GB NVMe or 2.4 TB SSD
Free Trial
Azure Virtual Machines
No trial information availableContabo
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
332
4.6
19
Ease of Use
8.6
332
5.2
20
Ease of Setup
8.6
198
5.6
13
Ease of Admin
8.6
190
4.7
5
Quality of Support
8.3
320
3.6
18
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
182
3.0
5
Product Direction (% positive)
9.2
320
3.9
19
Features by Category
Infrastructure Provision
9.0
60
6.1
6
8.6
55
7.0
5
9.0
52
8.0
5
7.2
48
7.0
5
8.3
53
8.0
5
9.3
58
7.3
5
8.5
48
7.3
5
9.1
56
6.7
5
Management
8.9
55
Feature Not Available
8.9
53
Feature Not Available
8.7
54
Feature Not Available
Functionality
8.8
53
8.0
5
Performance
8.4
25
Not enough data
8.3
25
Not enough data
9.0
26
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
29
Not enough data
8.5
28
Not enough data
8.7
28
Not enough data
9.3
29
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Server Virtualization
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Reliability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.0
5
Security
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Compatibility
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Virtual Private Servers (VPS)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Hosting Management
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
5.1
12
Not enough data
4.2
11
Not enough data
4.3
12
Not enough data
3.9
12
Not enough data
4.1
11
Not enough data
4.4
12
Not enough data
4.3
12
Not enough data
4.3
12
Not enough data
4.2
11
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Azure Virtual Machines and Contabo are categorized as Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS)
Unique Categories
Azure Virtual Machines is categorized as Server Virtualization
Contabo is categorized as Object Storage Solutions and VPS Hosting Platforms
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Azure Virtual Machines
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Contabo
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
29.8%
Computer Software
18.2%
Computer & Network Security
7.3%
Accounting
4.3%
Information Services
2.4%
Other
37.9%
Information Technology and Services
20.0%
Marketing and Advertising
15.0%
Computer Software
15.0%
Hospital & Health Care
10.0%
Textiles
5.0%
Other
35.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
What are Azure virtual machines used for?
2 Comments
RL
Some use cases:
Application Hosting, Development and Testing, Data Processing and Analytics, Disaster Recovery, High-Performance Computing (HPC), Hybrid...Read more
Contabo has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
