When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Dizzion DaaS easier to use, administer, and do business with overall. However, reviewers preferred the ease of set up with Azure Virtual Desktop.
Reviewers felt that Dizzion DaaS meets the needs of their business better than Azure Virtual Desktop.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Dizzion DaaS is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Azure Virtual Desktop over Dizzion DaaS.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Azure Virtual Desktop
No pricing available
Dizzion DaaS
No pricing available
Free Trial
Azure Virtual Desktop
No trial information available
Dizzion DaaS
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.0
9
9.0
13
Ease of Use
7.8
10
9.4
13
Ease of Setup
9.2
8
8.9
11
Ease of Admin
8.7
5
9.8
8
Quality of Support
8.1
8
9.0
12
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Can it be implemented on premise & not just in cloud
1 Comment
LS
Yes, you can use Frame on all major public clouds as well as on premise with Nutanix Enterprise Cloud / AHV.Read more
What about full on premise solution for particular organisations ?
1 Comment
LS
Hi Thibaud,
you can use Frame on premise with Nutanix Enterprise Cloud / AHV. We focus on small, medium and enterprise businesses starting with 5 users....Read more
What is Dizzion Managed Desktop as a Service (DaaS) used for?
1 Comment
RS
It provide businesses with secure, scalable, and compliant virtual desktops and applications. It enables organizations to support a modern workforce,...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.