Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Azure Traffic Manager and Progress Kemp LoadMaster

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Azure Traffic Manager
Azure Traffic Manager
Star Rating
(18)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (60.0% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Traffic Manager
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Star Rating
(202)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (51.6% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about Progress Kemp LoadMaster
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that Azure Traffic Manager excels in its ability to manage traffic across multiple regions, with features like "Geographic Routing" that allow for optimized performance based on user location, which reviewers say significantly enhances user experience.
  • Reviewers mention that Kemp LoadMaster offers robust Layer 7 load balancing capabilities, with features such as "SSL Offloading" that users say improve server performance by reducing the load on backend servers.
  • G2 users highlight Azure Traffic Manager's seamless integration with other Azure services, stating that this interoperability is a major advantage for enterprises already invested in the Azure ecosystem, while users on G2 note that Kemp LoadMaster's compatibility with various cloud environments is a strong point for mid-market companies.
  • Reviewers say that Azure Traffic Manager's "Custom Probes" feature allows for more precise health checks, which users report leads to higher availability and reliability of applications compared to Kemp LoadMaster's standard health check options.
  • Users mention that the user interface of Kemp LoadMaster is intuitive and easy to navigate, which reviewers say makes it easier for teams to manage load balancing tasks without extensive training, while Azure Traffic Manager's interface is seen as more complex, requiring a steeper learning curve.
  • Reviewers on G2 highlight that Azure Traffic Manager has a higher score for "Product Direction," with users saying that the continuous updates and feature enhancements reflect a strong commitment to evolving the product, whereas Kemp LoadMaster's updates are perceived as less frequent by some users.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Azure Traffic Manager
No pricing available
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
No pricing available
Free Trial
Azure Traffic Manager
No trial information available
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.4
12
9.2
144
Ease of Use
9.3
12
9.1
144
Ease of Setup
9.5
7
8.9
136
Ease of Admin
9.4
6
9.2
128
Quality of Support
9.4
9
9.2
136
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
9.4
139
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
12
9.1
137
Features by Category
Not enough data
8.1
38
Usability - Load Balancing
Not enough data
8.2
38
Not enough data
8.6
38
Not enough data
7.8
38
Not enough data
7.2
38
Performance Optimization - Load Balancing
Not enough data
8.6
36
Not enough data
8.2
38
Not enough data
8.4
37
Not enough data
8.3
36
Security & Compliance - Load Balancing
Not enough data
8.9
38
Not enough data
7.7
37
Not enough data
7.9
36
Not enough data
8.1
37
Not enough data
7.9
37
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Azure Traffic Manager
Azure Traffic Manager
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Azure Traffic Manager and Progress Kemp LoadMaster are categorized as Load Balancing
Unique Categories
Azure Traffic Manager
Azure Traffic Manager has no unique categories
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Progress Kemp LoadMaster has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Azure Traffic Manager
Azure Traffic Manager
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
13.3%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
26.7%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
60.0%
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
10.5%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
51.6%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
37.9%
Reviewers' Industry
Azure Traffic Manager
Azure Traffic Manager
Information Technology and Services
20.0%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
13.3%
Computer Software
13.3%
Telecommunications
6.7%
Retail
6.7%
Other
40.0%
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Information Technology and Services
12.1%
Financial Services
7.4%
Hospital & Health Care
6.8%
Computer & Network Security
4.7%
Government Administration
4.2%
Other
64.7%
Alternatives
Azure Traffic Manager
Azure Traffic Manager Alternatives
Cloudflare Application Security and Performance
Cloudflare Application Security and Performance
Add Cloudflare Application Security and Performance
Google Cloud Load Balancing
Google Cloud Load Balancing
Add Google Cloud Load Balancing
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
Add F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
AWS Elastic Load Balancing
AWS Elastic Load Balancing
Add AWS Elastic Load Balancing
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Progress Kemp LoadMaster Alternatives
HAProxy
HAProxy
Add HAProxy
F5 NGINX
Nginx
Add F5 NGINX
Traefik
Traefik
Add Traefik
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
Add F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
Discussions
Azure Traffic Manager
Azure Traffic Manager Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Azure Traffic Manager has no discussions with answers
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Progress Kemp LoadMaster Discussions
Can Kemp integrate with automation scripts?
2 Comments
NS
Hi John, The LoadMaster can be scripted to do things via PowerShell or an API wrapper such as java or anything else that can execute API commands. From...Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
Progress Kemp LoadMaster has no more discussions with answers