Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Azure Traffic Manager and Google Cloud Load Balancing

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Azure Traffic Manager
Azure Traffic Manager
Star Rating
(18)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (60.0% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Traffic Manager
Google Cloud Load Balancing
Google Cloud Load Balancing
Star Rating
(27)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (50.0% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Google Cloud Load Balancing
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that Google Cloud Load Balancing excels in its global load balancing capabilities, allowing for seamless traffic distribution across multiple regions, while Azure Traffic Manager is noted for its robust DNS-based traffic routing, which is particularly beneficial for users with a global audience.
  • Reviewers mention that Google Cloud Load Balancing has a slightly steeper learning curve, with an ease of use score of 8.4, compared to Azure Traffic Manager's 9.4, indicating that users find Azure's interface more intuitive and user-friendly.
  • G2 users highlight that Google Cloud Load Balancing's integration with other Google Cloud services is a significant advantage, providing a cohesive ecosystem for users already invested in Google’s platform, whereas Azure Traffic Manager is praised for its compatibility with a wide range of Microsoft services, making it a strong choice for enterprises already using Azure.
  • Users on G2 report that Google Cloud Load Balancing's support quality, rated at 8.5, is generally good, but Azure Traffic Manager shines with a higher support rating of 9.1, suggesting that Azure users feel more supported in their troubleshooting and operational needs.
  • Reviewers say that Google Cloud Load Balancing's product direction is highly rated at 9.6, indicating a strong commitment to innovation, while Azure Traffic Manager received a perfect score of 10.0, suggesting that users are extremely confident in its future development and enhancements.
  • Users say that while both products have their strengths, Azure Traffic Manager's ability to handle complex routing scenarios with ease, as highlighted by its ease of setup score of 9.4, makes it a preferred choice for enterprises needing advanced traffic management solutions.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Azure Traffic Manager
No pricing available
Google Cloud Load Balancing
No pricing available
Free Trial
Azure Traffic Manager
No trial information available
Google Cloud Load Balancing
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.4
12
8.8
21
Ease of Use
9.3
12
8.2
21
Ease of Setup
9.5
7
8.2
13
Ease of Admin
9.4
6
8.3
13
Quality of Support
9.4
9
8.6
20
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.6
13
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
12
9.4
21
Features by Category
Not enough data
Not enough data
Usability - Load Balancing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance Optimization - Load Balancing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security & Compliance - Load Balancing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Azure Traffic Manager
Azure Traffic Manager
Google Cloud Load Balancing
Google Cloud Load Balancing
Azure Traffic Manager and Google Cloud Load Balancing are categorized as Load Balancing
Unique Categories
Azure Traffic Manager
Azure Traffic Manager has no unique categories
Google Cloud Load Balancing
Google Cloud Load Balancing has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Azure Traffic Manager
Azure Traffic Manager
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
13.3%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
26.7%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
60.0%
Google Cloud Load Balancing
Google Cloud Load Balancing
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
50.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
23.1%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
26.9%
Reviewers' Industry
Azure Traffic Manager
Azure Traffic Manager
Information Technology and Services
20.0%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
13.3%
Computer Software
13.3%
Telecommunications
6.7%
Retail
6.7%
Other
40.0%
Google Cloud Load Balancing
Google Cloud Load Balancing
Information Technology and Services
23.1%
Computer Software
15.4%
Marketing and Advertising
11.5%
Research
7.7%
Higher Education
7.7%
Other
34.6%
Alternatives
Azure Traffic Manager
Azure Traffic Manager Alternatives
Cloudflare Application Security and Performance
Cloudflare Application Security and Performance
Add Cloudflare Application Security and Performance
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
Add F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
AWS Elastic Load Balancing
AWS Elastic Load Balancing
Add AWS Elastic Load Balancing
HAProxy
HAProxy
Add HAProxy
Google Cloud Load Balancing
Google Cloud Load Balancing Alternatives
Azure Application Gateway
Azure Application Gateway
Add Azure Application Gateway
HAProxy
HAProxy
Add HAProxy
AWS Elastic Load Balancing
AWS Elastic Load Balancing
Add AWS Elastic Load Balancing
Azure Load Balancer
Azure Load Balancer
Add Azure Load Balancer
Discussions
Azure Traffic Manager
Azure Traffic Manager Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Azure Traffic Manager has no discussions with answers
Google Cloud Load Balancing
Google Cloud Load Balancing Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Google Cloud Load Balancing has no discussions with answers