Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Azure SignalR Service and F5 NGINX 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Edgenexus ADC (Application Delivery Controller)
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (41.7% of reviews)
Small-Business (41.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Starting at $2500 per year
Azure SignalR Service
Star Rating
(13)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (41.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure SignalR ServiceF5 NGINX
Star Rating
(107)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (41.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $2500 per year
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that F5 NGINX excels in performance and reliability, achieving a score of 9.5, which reviewers attribute to its robust load balancing and server clustering capabilities. In contrast, Azure SignalR Service, while effective, does not match this level of performance, scoring lower in this area.
- Reviewers mention that F5 NGINX offers superior logging and reporting features, with a score of 9.3, allowing for detailed insights into application performance. Azure SignalR Service, however, lacks the same depth in logging capabilities, which users find limiting for troubleshooting.
- G2 users highlight that F5 NGINX provides excellent security features, particularly in SSL/TLS processing, scoring 9.0. Users appreciate the comprehensive website protection and infrastructure protection, while Azure SignalR Service, scoring lower in these areas, is seen as less robust in security measures.
- Users on G2 report that F5 NGINX has a more complex setup process, reflected in its ease of setup score of 8.3, compared to Azure SignalR Service's higher score of 8.8, indicating a more user-friendly experience for new users.
- Reviewers say that F5 NGINX shines in its API and integrations, scoring 8.0, which is crucial for users looking to connect with various web-based frameworks. Azure SignalR Service, while offering integrations, does not provide the same level of extensibility, which some users find limiting.
- Users report that F5 NGINX has a strong focus on microservices development, scoring 9.2, making it a preferred choice for organizations adopting modern architectures. Azure SignalR Service, while capable, does not emphasize this aspect as strongly, leading some users to prefer F5 NGINX for their microservices needs.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Azure SignalR Service
No pricing availableF5 NGINX
NGINX Plus, Single Instance
Starting at $2500
per year
24/7 Enterprise support with 30-minute SLA is available, for $5,000/year per instance.
We also provide Basic support for $2,500/year and Professional support for $3,500/year for less-critical deployments.
Free Trial
Azure SignalR Service
No trial information availableF5 NGINX
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.2
8
9.3
96
Ease of Use
8.8
7
8.4
96
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.3
65
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.4
65
Quality of Support
7.5
6
7.6
70
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
9.1
45
Product Direction (% positive)
7.1
8
9.0
93
Features by Category
Analysis
Not enough data
9.4
21
Not enough data
8.9
20
Not enough data
9.1
20
Controls
Not enough data
8.4
21
Not enough data
9.0
21
Not enough data
8.3
20
Functionality
Not enough data
8.2
18
Not enough data
8.1
21
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
8.5
22
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
9.1
23
Not enough data
8.0
18
Protection
Not enough data
8.1
21
Not enough data
9.2
22
Not enough data
9.1
23
Resolution
Not enough data
7.1
23
Not enough data
7.7
21
Not enough data
7.5
21
Not enough data
7.9
21
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Data Management
Not enough data
8.0
9
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
7.9
7
User Features
Not enough data
8.5
8
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
8.3
8
Modernization
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
9.2
8
Not enough data
7.7
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
AI Performance Improvement - Application Server
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Application Server
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Usability - Load Balancing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance Optimization - Load Balancing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security & Compliance - Load Balancing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Azure SignalR Service and F5 NGINX are categorized as Application Server and Web Server Accelerator
Unique Categories
Azure SignalR Service has no unique categories
F5 NGINX is categorized as Load Balancing, Container Networking, DDoS Protection, and Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Azure SignalR Service
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
F5 NGINX
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
33.3%
Computer Software
16.7%
Non-Profit Organization Management
8.3%
Hospital & Health Care
8.3%
Higher Education
8.3%
Other
25.0%
Information Technology and Services
38.7%
Computer Software
17.0%
Internet
7.5%
Retail
2.8%
E-Learning
2.8%
Other
31.1%
Alternatives
Discussions
Azure SignalR Service has no discussions with answers
Improve the delivery of static resources
3 Comments
MB
Application serverRead more
F5 NGINX has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
