Reduce your software costs by 18% overnight

Compare Azure Scheduler and IBM MQ

See this
side-by-side comparison of Azure Scheduler vs. IBM MQ
based on preference data from user reviews. Azure Scheduler rates 4.3/5 stars with 27 reviews. By contrast, IBM MQ rates 4.3/5 stars with 86 reviews. Each product's score is calculated with real-time data from verified user reviews, to help you make the best choice between these two options, and decide which one is best for your business needs.
Add Product
Azure Scheduler
Azure Scheduler
(27)
4.3 out of 5
Azure Scheduler
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
(86)
4.3 out of 5
IBM MQ
Optimized for quick response
Star Rating
Azure Scheduler
Azure Scheduler
Market Segments
Azure Scheduler
Azure Scheduler
Small-Business (48.0% of reviews)
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
Enterprise (80.8% of reviews)
Entry Level Price
Azure Scheduler
Azure Scheduler
No pricing information available
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
No pricing information available

Azure Scheduler vs IBM MQ

When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Azure Scheduler easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Azure Scheduler overall.

  • Azure Scheduler and IBM MQ both meet the requirements of our reviewers at a comparable rate.
  • When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that IBM MQ is the preferred option.
  • For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Azure Scheduler over IBM MQ.
Categories
Shared Categories
Azure Scheduler
Azure Scheduler
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
Azure Scheduler and IBM MQ are categorized as Message Queue (MQ)
Unique Categories
Azure Scheduler
Azure Scheduler has no unique categories
IBM MQ
IBM MQ is categorized as Business Activity Monitoring
Pricing
Azure Scheduler
Azure Scheduler Pricing
Free Trial Unavailable
IBM MQ
IBM MQ Pricing
IBM MQ
Contact Us
IBM MQ Advanced
Contact Us
IBM MQ Appliance
Contact Us
IBM MQ for for z/OS
Contact Us
Free Trial
Ratings
Meets Requirements
Azure Scheduler
Azure Scheduler
9.0
Responses: 17
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
9.0
Responses: 54
Ease of Use
Azure Scheduler
Azure Scheduler
8.5
Responses: 16
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
8.3
Responses: 54
Ease of Setup
Azure Scheduler
Azure Scheduler
8.3
Responses: 8
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
8.1
Responses: 42
Ease of Admin
Azure Scheduler
Azure Scheduler
8.8
Responses: 7
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
8.0
Responses: 42
Quality of Support
Azure Scheduler
Azure Scheduler
8.2
Responses: 16
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
8.3
Responses: 53
Ease of Doing Business With
Azure Scheduler
Azure Scheduler
9.8
Responses: 8
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
8.7
Responses: 41
Product Direction (% positive)
Azure Scheduler
Azure Scheduler
8.6
Responses: 17
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
7.4
Responses: 53
Features
Functionality
Asynchronous Messaging
Azure Scheduler
Azure Scheduler
8.2
Responses: 13
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
9.3
Responses: 22
Language Support
Azure Scheduler
Azure Scheduler
8.2
Responses: 13
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
8.6
Responses: 18
Cloud-based Messaging
Azure Scheduler
Azure Scheduler
8.6
Responses: 13
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
8.3
Responses: 12
Latency
Azure Scheduler
Azure Scheduler
8.3
Responses: 14
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
8.6
Responses: 19
Integration
Application Integration
Azure Scheduler
Azure Scheduler
8.9
Responses: 14
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
9.3
Responses: 20
Data Integration
Azure Scheduler
Azure Scheduler
8.6
Responses: 14
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
8.6
Responses: 18
Plugins and integrations
Azure Scheduler
Azure Scheduler
7.8
Responses: 12
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
8.4
Responses: 16
Management
Policies and Controls
Azure Scheduler
Azure Scheduler
8.5
Responses: 13
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
8.5
Responses: 16
Security Monitoring
Azure Scheduler
Azure Scheduler
8.7
Responses: 13
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
8.5
Responses: 14
Activity Monitoring
Azure Scheduler
Azure Scheduler
8.8
Responses: 13
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
7.9
Responses: 14
Reviewers' Company Size
Reviewers of Azure Scheduler were most often representing companies in the Small-Business segment, while reviewers for IBM MQ were more commonly in the Enterprise segment.
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Azure Scheduler
Azure Scheduler
48.0%
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
4.1%
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Azure Scheduler
Azure Scheduler
40.0%
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
15.1%
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Azure Scheduler
Azure Scheduler
12.0%
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
80.8%
Reviewers' Industry
Azure Scheduler
Azure Scheduler Industry
Information Technology and Services
16.0%
Insurance
8.0%
Telecommunications
4.0%
Sports
4.0%
Public Relations and Communications
4.0%
Other
64.0%
IBM MQ
IBM MQ Industry
Banking
16.4%
Financial Services
15.1%
Insurance
11.0%
Information Technology and Services
11.0%
Hospital & Health Care
8.2%
Other
38.4%
Reviews
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Azure Scheduler
G
Administrator in Automotive

The scheduler interface is very good and easy to use.

IBM MQ
GT
Administrator in Tobacco

MQ and message queuing is not the most sexy of applications. Few will have a need for it, but when you do, you'll realise how critical this can be. If you build a system that needs to support hundreds/thousands of transactions per hour, the biggest worry is...

Most Helpful Critical Review
Azure Scheduler
Derrick N.
User in Non-Profit Organization Management

Somewhat hard to trouble shoot when we encounter a problem.

IBM MQ
G
User in Biotechnology

The interface is not the most user friendly and at times is hard to navigate

Discussions
Azure Scheduler
Azure Scheduler Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Azure Scheduler has no discussions with answers
IBM MQ
IBM MQ Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
IBM MQ has no discussions with answers
Screenshots
Azure Scheduler
Azure Scheduler Screenshots
No screenshots provided
IBM MQ
IBM MQ Screenshots
No screenshots provided
Videos
Azure Scheduler
Azure Scheduler Videos
No videos provided
IBM MQ
IBM MQ Videos
Video Preview

Upgrade your messaging solution with IBM MQ.

Downloads
Azure Scheduler
Azure Scheduler Downloads
No downloads provided
IBM MQ
IBM MQ Downloads
Request More InformationRequest More InformationAsk IBM MQ a QuestionContact IBM MQ
Need help?
I can help.
Kate
Learning about Business Software?
Ask the community