Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Azure Queue Storage and IBM MQ

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Azure Queue Storage
Azure Queue Storage
Star Rating
(13)3.9 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (33.3% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Queue Storage
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
Star Rating
(174)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (62.0% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Browse all 4 pricing plans
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that IBM MQ excels in asynchronous messaging with a score of 9.0, highlighting its robust support for complex messaging patterns, while Azure Queue Storage, with a score of 8.3, is noted for its simplicity but may lack some advanced features.
  • Reviewers mention that Azure Queue Storage offers superior ease of setup and administration, scoring 9.4 in both categories, making it a preferred choice for teams looking for quick deployment and minimal management overhead compared to IBM MQ's scores of 8.1 and 8.0 respectively.
  • G2 users highlight that IBM MQ provides strong language support with a score of 8.4, which is beneficial for enterprises using diverse programming languages, whereas Azure Queue Storage scores lower at 7.9, indicating potential limitations in multi-language environments.
  • Users on G2 appreciate Azure Queue Storage's cloud-based messaging capabilities, scoring 9.2, which aligns well with modern cloud-native applications, while IBM MQ's score of 8.4 suggests it may not be as optimized for cloud environments.
  • Reviewers mention that IBM MQ has a solid disaster recovery score of 7.9, but Azure Queue Storage shines with its higher scores in business recovery (8.2) and contingency planning (8.0), indicating a more comprehensive approach to ensuring message durability and availability.
  • Users say that IBM MQ's policies and controls score of 8.3 is commendable, but Azure Queue Storage outperforms with a score of 9.3, reflecting its stronger security and compliance features, which are crucial for enterprises handling sensitive data.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Azure Queue Storage
No pricing available
IBM MQ
No pricing available
Free Trial
Azure Queue Storage
No trial information available
IBM MQ
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
9
8.9
123
Ease of Use
8.5
9
8.2
125
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.2
91
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.0
87
Quality of Support
8.5
9
8.3
118
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.6
85
Product Direction (% positive)
7.1
8
8.0
116
Features by Category
8.5
7
8.3
86
Functionality
8.3
7
9.0
78
7.9
7
8.4
70
9.2
6
8.5
59
7.9
7
8.2
73
Integration
8.6
6
8.7
75
8.7
5
8.6
71
7.8
6
8.1
68
Management
9.3
7
8.5
69
8.8
7
8.6
65
8.8
7
8.5
65
Agentic AI - Message Queue (MQ)
Not enough data
6.7
6
Not enough data
7.5
6
Not enough data
9.7
6
Not enough data
6.9
6
Business Activity MonitoringHide 7 FeaturesShow 7 Features
Not enough data
8.1
16
Risk
Not enough data
8.3
15
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.1
12
Recovery
Not enough data
7.9
15
Not enough data
8.1
14
Not enough data
7.9
13
Agentic AI - Business Activity Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Azure Queue Storage
Azure Queue Storage
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
Azure Queue Storage and IBM MQ are categorized as Message Queue (MQ)
Unique Categories
Azure Queue Storage
Azure Queue Storage has no unique categories
IBM MQ
IBM MQ is categorized as Business Activity Monitoring
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Azure Queue Storage
Azure Queue Storage
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
33.3%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
33.3%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
33.3%
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
12.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
25.9%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
62.0%
Reviewers' Industry
Azure Queue Storage
Azure Queue Storage
Information Technology and Services
16.7%
Computer Software
16.7%
Retail
8.3%
Market Research
8.3%
Libraries
8.3%
Other
41.7%
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
Banking
20.3%
Information Technology and Services
15.2%
Financial Services
10.1%
Insurance
6.3%
Hospital & Health Care
5.1%
Other
43.0%
Alternatives
Azure Queue Storage
Azure Queue Storage Alternatives
Apache Kafka
Apache Kafka
Add Apache Kafka
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ
Add RabbitMQ
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
Add MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
Lobster Data Platform
Lobster Data Platform
Add Lobster Data Platform
IBM MQ
IBM MQ Alternatives
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
Add MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
Apache Kafka
Apache Kafka
Add Apache Kafka
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ
Add RabbitMQ
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Add Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Discussions
Azure Queue Storage
Azure Queue Storage Discussions
Are you looking for someone to put the system into practice?
1 Comment
Estelle N.
EN
It is having someone to help you get the system up and running, if the conditions are affordable I agree to get them up and running.Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
Azure Queue Storage has no more discussions with answers
IBM MQ
IBM MQ Discussions
What is IBM MQ used for?
2 Comments
Ahmed s.
AS
Messaging and monitoring Read more
Is IBM MQ free?
1 Comment
DA
IBM offers both server and client packages. The clients are free and readily available to download from https://ibm.com, but are not usable on their own,...Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
IBM MQ has no more discussions with answers