Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Azure Media Player and Videojs 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (76.9% of reviews)
Mid-Market (64.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Azure Media Player
Star Rating
(14)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (76.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Media PlayerVideojs
Star Rating
(15)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (64.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about VideojsSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Azure Media Player excels in its integration with Azure services, making it a preferred choice for businesses already utilizing the Azure ecosystem, while Videojs is praised for its flexibility and extensive plugin support, allowing for a more customizable user experience.
- Reviewers mention that Azure Media Player has a higher ease of use rating (8.7) compared to Videojs (8.1), indicating that users find Azure's interface more intuitive, especially for those who are not as technically inclined.
- G2 users highlight Azure Media Player's quality of support (8.5) as a strong point, with many noting quick response times and helpful resources, whereas Videojs users report a lower support rating (7.7), suggesting that assistance may not be as readily available or effective.
- Users on G2 indicate that Azure Media Player's product direction (7.4) is viewed positively, with many appreciating the regular updates and feature enhancements, while Videojs users express some concerns about the pace of development and feature rollouts, reflected in its lower rating (6.8).
- Reviewers say that Azure Media Player is particularly beneficial for small businesses, as 76.9% of its reviews come from this segment, indicating a strong alignment with the needs of smaller organizations, while Videojs, with 64.3% of reviews from mid-market users, may cater more to those with slightly larger scale requirements.
- Users report that Azure Media Player's seamless integration with adaptive bitrate streaming is a standout feature, enhancing playback quality, while Videojs is noted for its robust support for various video formats and codecs, making it a versatile choice for diverse media needs.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Azure Media Player
No pricing availableVideojs
No pricing availableFree Trial
Azure Media Player
No trial information availableVideojs
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.9
9
8.5
13
Ease of Use
8.7
9
8.1
13
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.5
9
7.7
10
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
7.4
9
6.8
11
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Azure Media Player and Videojs are categorized as Other Video
Unique Categories
Azure Media Player has no unique categories
Videojs has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Azure Media Player
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Videojs
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Telecommunications
15.4%
Arts and Crafts
15.4%
Marketing and Advertising
7.7%
Internet
7.7%
Hospital & Health Care
7.7%
Other
46.2%
Computer Software
57.1%
Marketing and Advertising
14.3%
Information Technology and Services
14.3%
Investment Management
7.1%
Higher Education
7.1%
Other
0.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
Azure Media Player has no discussions with answers
Videojs has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
