Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Azure Load Balancer and HashiCorp Consul 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Load Balancer Enterprise ADC
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Edgenexus ADC (Application Delivery Controller)
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
HAProxy
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (35.7% of reviews)
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Azure Load Balancer
Star Rating
(30)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (35.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Load BalancerHashiCorp Consul
Star Rating
(23)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about HashiCorp ConsulSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that HashiCorp Consul excels in service discovery and networking capabilities, allowing for seamless communication between microservices, while Azure Load Balancer is primarily focused on load balancing and traffic distribution.
- Reviewers mention that Consul's extensibility is a strong point, enabling integration with various tools and platforms, whereas Azure Load Balancer offers limited extensibility options, which may restrict customization for specific use cases.
- G2 users highlight that Consul provides robust monitoring features, including health checks and metrics, which are essential for maintaining service reliability, while Azure Load Balancer's monitoring capabilities are more basic and primarily focused on traffic metrics.
- Users on G2 appreciate Consul's support for multiple protocols, making it versatile for different application architectures, whereas Azure Load Balancer is more limited in this regard, primarily supporting HTTP and TCP protocols.
- Reviewers say that Consul's security features, such as secure communications and policy management, are well-regarded, providing a comprehensive approach to securing service interactions, while Azure Load Balancer's security features are less comprehensive, focusing mainly on network-level protections.
- Users report that the ease of setup for Azure Load Balancer is generally higher, with a more straightforward configuration process compared to HashiCorp Consul, which may require more time and expertise to fully implement.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Azure Load Balancer
No pricing availableHashiCorp Consul
No pricing availableFree Trial
Azure Load Balancer
No trial information availableHashiCorp Consul
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
22
9.1
16
Ease of Use
8.8
22
8.9
16
Ease of Setup
9.5
10
8.5
9
Ease of Admin
9.4
9
9.4
9
Quality of Support
8.2
22
8.3
15
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.3
9
8.7
9
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
22
9.2
15
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Networking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Protection
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Usability - Load Balancing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance Optimization - Load Balancing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security & Compliance - Load Balancing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Azure Load Balancer and HashiCorp Consul are categorized as Load Balancing
Unique Categories
Azure Load Balancer has no unique categories
HashiCorp Consul is categorized as Data Center Networking, Service Discovery, Container Networking, and Service Mesh Tools
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Azure Load Balancer
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
HashiCorp Consul
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
39.3%
Information Technology and Services
17.9%
Financial Services
7.1%
Computer & Network Security
7.1%
Telecommunications
3.6%
Other
25.0%
Information Technology and Services
30.0%
Financial Services
10.0%
Computer Software
10.0%
Banking
10.0%
Telecommunications
5.0%
Other
35.0%
Discussions
Azure Load Balancer has no discussions with answers
HashiCorp Consul has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
