Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Azure Linux Virtual Machines and Azure Virtual Machines 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Hostman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Triton DataCenter
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (43.5% of reviews)
Enterprise (34.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Azure Linux Virtual Machines
Star Rating
(25)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (43.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Linux Virtual MachinesAzure Virtual Machines
Star Rating
(385)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (34.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Virtual MachinesSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Azure Virtual Machines excel in scalability, with a score of 8.6, allowing businesses to easily adjust resources based on demand. In contrast, Azure Linux Virtual Machines, while still effective, received a slightly lower score of 8.2 in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Azure Virtual Machines provide robust data recovery options, scoring 9.0, which is crucial for enterprise-level applications. Azure Linux Virtual Machines, however, scored lower at 7.7, indicating potential limitations in this critical functionality.
- G2 users highlight the superior OS integration of Azure Virtual Machines, scoring 8.8, which facilitates smoother operations for Windows-based applications. Conversely, Azure Linux Virtual Machines, while functional, did not match this level of integration, impacting user experience for those reliant on Windows environments.
- Users on G2 appreciate the resource auto-scaling feature of Azure Virtual Machines, scoring 8.9, which allows for automatic adjustments to resource allocation based on real-time needs. Azure Linux Virtual Machines, while offering similar capabilities, received a lower score, indicating less efficiency in this area.
- Reviewers say that Azure Virtual Machines shine in security, with a score of 9.3, making it a preferred choice for organizations prioritizing data protection. Azure Linux Virtual Machines, while secure, scored slightly lower at 8.3, suggesting that users may have some concerns regarding its security features.
- Users report that Azure Virtual Machines offer better performance management tools, scoring 8.8, which helps in monitoring and optimizing resource usage effectively. Azure Linux Virtual Machines, with a score of 8.4, may not provide the same level of insight, potentially leading to less efficient resource management.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Azure Linux Virtual Machines
No pricing availableAzure Virtual Machines
No pricing availableFree Trial
Azure Linux Virtual Machines
No trial information availableAzure Virtual Machines
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.6
18
9.0
332
Ease of Use
8.1
18
8.6
332
Ease of Setup
7.7
5
8.6
198
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.6
190
Quality of Support
8.2
18
8.3
320
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.9
182
Product Direction (% positive)
9.4
19
9.2
320
Features by Category
Infrastructure Provision
8.3
7
9.0
60
8.1
6
8.6
55
Not enough data
9.0
52
Not enough data
7.2
48
7.2
6
8.3
53
9.5
7
9.3
58
Not enough data
8.5
48
8.6
6
9.1
56
Management
8.3
6
8.9
55
8.3
6
8.9
53
8.7
5
8.7
54
Functionality
9.0
5
8.8
53
Performance
Not enough data
8.4
25
Not enough data
8.3
25
Not enough data
9.0
26
Functionality
Not enough data
8.9
29
Not enough data
8.5
28
Not enough data
8.7
28
Not enough data
9.3
29
Agentic AI - Server Virtualization
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Azure Linux Virtual Machines and Azure Virtual Machines are categorized as Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS)
Unique Categories
Azure Linux Virtual Machines has no unique categories
Azure Virtual Machines is categorized as Server Virtualization
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Azure Linux Virtual Machines
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Azure Virtual Machines
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Consumer Goods
17.4%
Information Technology and Services
13.0%
Telecommunications
8.7%
Computer Software
8.7%
Manufacturing
4.3%
Other
47.8%
Information Technology and Services
29.8%
Computer Software
18.2%
Computer & Network Security
7.3%
Accounting
4.3%
Information Services
2.4%
Other
37.9%
Alternatives
Discussions
Azure Linux Virtual Machines has no discussions with answers
What are Azure virtual machines used for?
2 Comments
RL
Some use cases:
Application Hosting, Development and Testing, Data Processing and Analytics, Disaster Recovery, High-Performance Computing (HPC), Hybrid...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
