Users report that Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) excels in application performance with a score of 9.3, while Tanzu, although strong, has not reached the same level, indicating that AKS may provide a more robust environment for high-performance applications.
Reviewers mention that AKS offers superior orchestration capabilities with a score of 9.2 compared to Tanzu's 9.1, suggesting that users may find AKS more efficient for managing containerized applications.
G2 users highlight that AKS has a more favorable ease of setup rating of 8.7, while Tanzu's score of 7.8 indicates that users may face more challenges when initially configuring the system.
Users on G2 report that AKS provides better access control features with a score of 8.9, compared to Tanzu's 8.2, which may be crucial for organizations prioritizing security and compliance.
Reviewers say that Tanzu shines in its developer toolkit, scoring 9.1, which is significantly higher than AKS's 7.8, making it a better choice for teams focused on development efficiency and tooling.
Users mention that while both products have strong data management capabilities, AKS's data replication score of 8.8 is slightly better than Tanzu's, indicating a potential edge in ensuring data consistency across environments.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
No pricing available
Tanzu
No pricing available
Free Trial
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
No trial information available
Tanzu
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
101
8.5
27
Ease of Use
8.5
102
8.5
28
Ease of Setup
8.6
62
7.8
13
Ease of Admin
8.4
55
8.5
12
Quality of Support
8.4
92
8.5
27
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.