Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) and Microsoft Azure Red Hat OpenShift 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Komodor
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Cloudways
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (43.5% of reviews)
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Star Rating
(114)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (43.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)Microsoft Azure Red Hat OpenShift
Star Rating
(12)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Microsoft Azure Red Hat OpenShiftSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) excels in application deployment with a score of 9.7, highlighting its seamless integration with Azure DevOps, which allows for efficient CI/CD pipelines. In contrast, Microsoft Azure Red Hat OpenShift, while strong, has a slightly lower score in this area, indicating that users find it less intuitive for deployment processes.
- Reviewers mention that the quality of support for Microsoft Azure Red Hat OpenShift is notably higher, scoring 9.6 compared to AKS's 8.3. Users appreciate the dedicated support from Red Hat, which they feel enhances their overall experience and troubleshooting capabilities.
- G2 users indicate that Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) offers superior ease of use with a score of 8.7, particularly praising its user-friendly interface and straightforward setup process. Conversely, users on G2 report that OpenShift, while powerful, can be more complex to navigate, which may lead to a steeper learning curve.
- Users say that AKS shines in its networking capabilities, scoring 9.4, with features like Azure Virtual Network integration that simplifies network management. On the other hand, OpenShift's networking features, while robust, do not receive the same level of acclaim, leading to a perception of less flexibility in certain scenarios.
- Reviewers mention that both platforms provide strong security features, but Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) scores slightly higher at 9.2. Users appreciate its built-in security measures, such as Azure Active Directory integration, which enhances access control and identity management.
- Users report that the developer toolkit for Microsoft Azure Red Hat OpenShift, scoring 7.8, is less comprehensive compared to AKS's offerings. Reviewers highlight that AKS provides a more extensive set of development tools, making it easier for developers to build and manage applications effectively.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
No pricing availableMicrosoft Azure Red Hat OpenShift
No pricing availableFree Trial
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
No trial information availableMicrosoft Azure Red Hat OpenShift
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.5
101
9.2
8
Ease of Use
8.5
102
9.0
8
Ease of Setup
8.6
62
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.4
55
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.4
92
9.6
8
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.6
53
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.5
98
10.0
8
Features by Category
Development
Not enough data
9.7
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
6
Database
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.1
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Infrastructure
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
9.7
6
Not enough data
9.2
6
Management
8.8
19
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Organization
8.2
18
Not enough data
8.5
19
Not enough data
8.4
18
Not enough data
Development
7.8
20
Not enough data
8.3
19
Not enough data
7.9
18
Not enough data
8.1
19
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) and Microsoft Azure Red Hat OpenShift are categorized as Container Orchestration
Unique Categories
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is categorized as Container Management
Microsoft Azure Red Hat OpenShift is categorized as Cloud Platform as a Service (PaaS)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Microsoft Azure Red Hat OpenShift
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
27.8%
Computer Software
23.1%
Telecommunications
5.6%
Financial Services
4.6%
Computer & Network Security
3.7%
Other
35.2%
Information Technology and Services
50.0%
Telecommunications
25.0%
Information Services
8.3%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
8.3%
Computer Software
8.3%
Other
0.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is azure Kubernetes service aks?
1 Comment
NB
It is the managed service from the Azure for hosting Kubernetes cluster on the Azure CLoud.Read more
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) has no more discussions with answers
Microsoft Azure Red Hat OpenShift has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
