# Azure DevOps Server vs Git Comparison
---
## AI Generated Summary
- **G2 reviewers report** that Azure DevOps Server excels in providing an integrated solution for the entire software development lifecycle, allowing teams to manage everything from business requirements to user stories and sprint tracking all in one place. Users appreciate how it links commits and pull requests back to work items, streamlining their workflow.
- **Users say** that Git stands out for its robust version control capabilities, making it easy to track changes and manage code versions effectively. Reviewers highlight features like branching and merge requests, which enhance collaboration and code review processes, making it a go-to tool for many developers.
- **According to verified reviews** , Azure DevOps Server faces challenges with setup and configuration, as some users mention it can be complex to implement. However, once set up, its flexibility and integration with various development tools are praised, making it a powerful platform for teams that can navigate its initial hurdles.
- **Reviewers mention** that Git's ease of use is a significant advantage, with many users noting that it requires minimal setup and allows for quick onboarding. This simplicity is particularly beneficial for small teams or projects, where users can start managing their code without extensive training.
- **G2 reviewers highlight** that while Azure DevOps Server offers strong support features, Git's support quality is rated slightly higher, with users appreciating the responsiveness and helpfulness of the Git community. This can be a crucial factor for teams that rely on timely assistance during development.
- **Users report** that both platforms have their strengths, but Git's higher overall satisfaction ratings suggest it may be a better fit for teams focused primarily on version control and collaboration. In contrast, Azure DevOps Server is ideal for organizations looking for a comprehensive DevOps solution that encompasses more than just version control.



| | Azure DevOps Server | Git | 
|---|---|---|
| **Star Rating** | 4.2 out of 5 | 4.7 out of 5 | 
| **Total Reviews** | 198 | 534 | 
| **Largest Market Segment** | Enterprise (40.6% of reviews) | Small-Business (35.5% of reviews) | 
| **Entry Level Price** | No pricing available | No pricing available | 

---
## Top Pros & Cons

### Azure DevOps Server

Pros:
- Automation (2 reviews)
- Collaboration (2 reviews)

Cons:
- Complex Setup (2 reviews)
- Difficulty (2 reviews)

### Git

**Not enough data**

---
## Ratings Comparison
| Rating | Azure DevOps Server | Git | 
|---|---|---|
  | **Meets Requirements** | 8.7 (185 reviews) | 9.4 (464 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Use** | 7.9 (185 reviews) | 8.2 (466 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Setup** | 7.2 (68 reviews) | 9.0 (133 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Admin** | 7.4 (60 reviews) | 8.2 (72 reviews) | 
  | **Quality of Support** | 8.2 (143 reviews) | 8.7 (378 reviews) | 
  | **Has the product been a good partner in doing business?** | 7.6 (54 reviews) | 8.7 (57 reviews) | 
  | **Product Direction (% positive)** | 7.8 (183 reviews) | 9.1 (450 reviews) | 

---
## Pricing

### Azure DevOps Server

#### Entry-Level Pricing

No pricing available

#### Free Trial

No information available

### Git

#### Entry-Level Pricing

No pricing available

#### Free Trial

No information available

---
## Features Comparison By Category

### Continuous Delivery

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **Azure DevOps Server** | 8.7/10 | 25 |
| **Git** | N/A | N/A |

#### Functionality

| Feature | Azure DevOps Server | Git | 
|---|---|---|
| **Deployment-Ready Staging** | 8.9 (25 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Integration** | 8.6 (25 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Extensible** | 8.5 (24 reviews) | Not enough data | 

#### Management

| Feature | Azure DevOps Server | Git | 
|---|---|---|
| **Processes and Workflow** | 8.9 (25 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Reporting** | 8.7 (25 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Automation** | 8.5 (25 reviews) | Not enough data | 

#### Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery

| Feature | Azure DevOps Server | Git | 
|---|---|---|
| **Autonomous Task Execution** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Cross-system Integration** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Adaptive Learning** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Natural Language Interaction** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Proactive Assistance** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

### Continuous Integration

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **Azure DevOps Server** | 8.7/10 | 38 |
| **Git** | N/A | N/A |

#### Functionality

| Feature | Azure DevOps Server | Git | 
|---|---|---|
| **Integrations** | 8.8 (33 reviews) ✓ Verified | Not enough data | 
| **Extensibility** | 8.4 (33 reviews) ✓ Verified | Not enough data | 
| **Test Customization** | 8.5 (33 reviews) | Not enough data | 

#### Management

| Feature | Azure DevOps Server | Git | 
|---|---|---|
| **Automation** | 8.9 (35 reviews) ✓ Verified | Not enough data | 
| **Processes and Workflow** | 8.8 (38 reviews) ✓ Verified | Not enough data | 
| **Reporting** | 8.5 (36 reviews) ✓ Verified | Not enough data | 

#### Agentic AI - Continuous Integration

| Feature | Azure DevOps Server | Git | 
|---|---|---|
| **Autonomous Task Execution** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Cross-system Integration** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Adaptive Learning** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Natural Language Interaction** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Proactive Assistance** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

---
## Categories
**Shared Categories (1):** [Version Control Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/version-control-software)

**Unique to Azure DevOps Server (5):** [Version Control Hosting Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/version-control-hosting), [Peer Code Review Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/peer-code-review), [Continuous Delivery Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/continuous-delivery-tools), [Continuous Integration Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/continuous-integration), [Build Automation Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/build-automation)



---
## Reviewer Demographics

### By Company Size

| Segment | Azure DevOps Server | Git | 
|---|---|---|
| **Small-Business** | 20.3% | 35.5% | 
| **Mid-Market** | 39.1% | 29.0% | 
| **Enterprise** | 40.6% | 35.5% | 

### By Industry

#### Azure DevOps Server

- **Information Technology and Services:** 28.6%
- **Computer Software:** 25.0%
- **Financial Services:** 4.7%
- **Hospital & Health Care:** 4.7%
- **Insurance:** 2.6%
- **Banking:** 2.1%
- **Higher Education:** 2.1%
- **Automotive:** 1.6%
- **Education Management:** 1.6%
- **Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing:** 1.6%
- **Other:** 25.5%

#### Git

- **Computer Software:** 32.8%
- **Information Technology and Services:** 20.7%
- **Internet:** 8.6%
- **Marketing and Advertising:** 4.0%
- **Computer & Network Security:** 2.9%
- **Education Management:** 2.9%
- **Higher Education:** 1.9%
- **Financial Services:** 1.9%
- **Computer Networking:** 1.7%
- **Automotive:** 1.5%
- **Other:** 20.9%

---
## Alternatives

### Alternatives to Azure DevOps Server

- [GitHub](https://www.g2.com/products/github/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (2366 reviews)
- [GitLab](https://www.g2.com/products/gitlab/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (896 reviews)
- [Jenkins](https://www.g2.com/products/jenkins/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (566 reviews)
- [CircleCI](https://www.g2.com/products/circleci/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (509 reviews)
- [Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/red-hat-ansible-automation-platform/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (377 reviews)
- [Bitbucket](https://www.g2.com/products/bitbucket/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (1013 reviews)
- [Travis CI](https://www.g2.com/products/travis-ci/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (92 reviews)
- [TeamCity](https://www.g2.com/products/teamcity/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (88 reviews)
- [Bamboo](https://www.g2.com/products/bamboo/reviews) — 4.1/5 stars (69 reviews)
- [Octopus Deploy](https://www.g2.com/products/octopus-deploy/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (58 reviews)

### Alternatives to Git

- [P4](https://www.g2.com/products/p4/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (95 reviews)
- [AWS CodeCommit](https://www.g2.com/products/aws-codecommit/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (87 reviews)
- [Subversion](https://www.g2.com/products/subversion/reviews) — 3.9/5 stars (64 reviews)
- [Rational ClearCase](https://www.g2.com/products/rational-clearcase/reviews) — 2.9/5 stars (40 reviews)
- [Plastic SCM](https://www.g2.com/products/plastic-scm/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (36 reviews)
- [Mercurial](https://www.g2.com/products/mercurial/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (31 reviews)
- [OpenText AccuRev](https://www.g2.com/products/opentext-accurev/reviews) — 3.8/5 stars (20 reviews)
- [CVS](https://www.g2.com/products/cvs/reviews) — 3.5/5 stars (13 reviews)
- [Harness Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/harness-platform/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (281 reviews)
- [Kiln](https://www.g2.com/products/kiln/reviews) — 5.0/5 stars (1 reviews)

---
## Top Discussions

### Azure DevOps Server

- Title: [Is Team Foundation Server part of Visual Studio?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/is-team-foundation-server-part-of-visual-studio) — 1 comment
  > **Top comment:** "NO"

### Git

- Title: [What is Git used for?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-is-git-used-for) — 4 comments, 1 upvote
  > **Top comment:** "version control"
- Title: [sdfsfdsfsfdsfsfsfsfsfsfsfsf](https://www.g2.com/discussions/sdfsfdsfsfdsfsfsfsfsfsfsfsf) — 2 comments, 1 upvote
  > **Top comment:** "bad review"
- Title: [what is the most channeling use of Git in your experience](https://www.g2.com/discussions/29849-what-is-the-most-channeling-use-of-git-in-your-experience) — 2 comments
  > **Top comment:** "The most use I have found for it is effectively communicating with a repository. I use it to merge over new code. "

---
**Source:** [G2.com](https://www.g2.com) | [Comparison Page](https://www.g2.com/compare/azure-devops-server-vs-git)