Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Azure CycleCloud and Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Azure CycleCloud
Azure CycleCloud
Star Rating
(14)3.9 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (76.9% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure CycleCloud
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Star Rating
(114)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (43.5% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) excels in its ease of use, with a score of 8.7, making it a preferred choice for enterprises looking for a straightforward setup. In contrast, Azure CycleCloud has a lower ease of use rating of 7.5, which may pose challenges for small businesses trying to implement the software.
  • Reviewers mention that AKS offers robust access control features, scoring 8.9, which is crucial for enterprise-level security. On the other hand, Azure CycleCloud does not provide the same level of access control, which could be a concern for organizations handling sensitive data.
  • G2 users highlight that AKS has a strong orchestration capability with a score of 8.4, allowing for efficient management of containerized applications. Conversely, Azure CycleCloud's orchestration features are not as highly rated, which may limit its effectiveness in managing complex workloads.
  • Users on G2 appreciate the quality of support provided by Azure CycleCloud, which scored 8.5, indicating that small businesses may find more responsive assistance. However, AKS's support quality is slightly lower at 8.3, which could affect enterprise users who require immediate help.
  • Reviewers say that AKS shines in its product direction, with a high score of 9.6, suggesting a strong commitment to future enhancements and features. In contrast, Azure CycleCloud's product direction score of 8.8 indicates a solid but less aggressive roadmap for development.
  • Users report that AKS's container networking capabilities, rated at 8.5, provide seamless integration for developers, enhancing productivity. Azure CycleCloud, while functional, does not match this level of performance, which may hinder developers looking for efficient networking solutions.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Azure CycleCloud
No pricing available
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
No pricing available
Free Trial
Azure CycleCloud
No trial information available
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.3
10
8.5
101
Ease of Use
7.7
11
8.5
102
Ease of Setup
7.8
9
8.6
62
Ease of Admin
7.8
9
8.4
55
Quality of Support
8.7
9
8.4
92
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.8
9
8.6
53
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
11
9.5
98
Features by Category
Not enough data
8.3
23
Management
Not enough data
8.8
19
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Organization
Not enough data
8.2
18
Not enough data
8.5
19
Not enough data
8.4
18
Development
Not enough data
7.8
20
Not enough data
8.3
19
Not enough data
7.9
18
Not enough data
8.1
19
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Azure CycleCloud
Azure CycleCloud
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Azure CycleCloud and Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) are categorized as Container Orchestration
Unique Categories
Azure CycleCloud
Azure CycleCloud has no unique categories
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is categorized as Container Management
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Azure CycleCloud
Azure CycleCloud
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
76.9%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
15.4%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
7.7%
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
25.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
31.5%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
43.5%
Reviewers' Industry
Azure CycleCloud
Azure CycleCloud
Computer Software
38.5%
Information Technology and Services
15.4%
Telecommunications
7.7%
Market Research
7.7%
Insurance
7.7%
Other
23.1%
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Information Technology and Services
27.8%
Computer Software
23.1%
Telecommunications
5.6%
Financial Services
4.6%
Computer & Network Security
3.7%
Other
35.2%
Alternatives
Azure CycleCloud
Azure CycleCloud Alternatives
VMware vSphere
VMware vSphere
Add VMware vSphere
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
Add DigitalOcean
Akamai Cloud Computing
Akamai Cloud Computing
Add Akamai Cloud Computing
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Add Red Hat OpenShift
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) Alternatives
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Add Red Hat OpenShift
Mirantis Kubernetes Engine (formerly Docker Enterprise)
Mirantis
Add Mirantis Kubernetes Engine (formerly Docker Enterprise)
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
Add Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE)
Kubernetes Engine
Add Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE)
Discussions
Azure CycleCloud
Azure CycleCloud Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Azure CycleCloud has no discussions with answers
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) Discussions
What is azure Kubernetes service aks?
1 Comment
Nikhil B.
NB
It is the managed service from the Azure for hosting Kubernetes cluster on the Azure CLoud.Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) has no more discussions with answers