Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Azure Cost Management and Billing and IBM Turbonomic 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Komodor
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (50.0% of reviews)
Enterprise (45.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial
Azure Cost Management and Billing
Star Rating
(12)3.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (50.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Cost Management and BillingIBM Turbonomic
Star Rating
(282)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (45.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free Trial
Free Trial is available
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that IBM Turbonomic excels in Cloud Optimization with a score of 8.8, allowing for efficient resource allocation and cost savings, while Azure Cost Management and Billing, with a score of 8.7, provides solid Spend Forecasting and Optimization features but lacks the same level of proactive resource management.
- Reviewers mention that IBM Turbonomic's Real-Time Monitoring capabilities, scoring 9.0, are superior, providing immediate insights into cloud infrastructure performance, whereas Azure's monitoring features, while effective, do not match the depth and responsiveness of Turbonomic's offerings.
- G2 users highlight the ease of use of IBM Turbonomic, scoring 8.5, which is significantly higher than Azure's 7.2, indicating that Turbonomic's interface and user experience are more intuitive for everyday users.
- Users on G2 report that IBM Turbonomic's Quality of Support is rated at 8.9, reflecting a strong commitment to customer service, while Azure's support, rated at 7.5, has been noted as less responsive and comprehensive by some users.
- Reviewers say that IBM Turbonomic's Multi-Cloud Management feature, scoring 9.2, is particularly robust, allowing users to manage resources across different cloud environments seamlessly, while Azure's capabilities in this area, although good, do not provide the same level of integration and flexibility.
- Users report that IBM Turbonomic's Automation features, with a score of 8.7, significantly enhance operational efficiency, whereas Azure's automation tools, while functional, do not offer the same level of sophistication or user satisfaction.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Azure Cost Management and Billing
No pricing availableIBM Turbonomic
Free Trial
Free Trial
Get started with Turbonomic for a 30-day evaluation with unlimited optimization of your application resources and cloud costs for your AWS, Azure and GCP accounts.
- Public cloud optimization
Free Trial
Azure Cost Management and Billing
No trial information availableIBM Turbonomic
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
9
8.7
207
Ease of Use
7.2
9
8.4
216
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.3
170
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.5
141
Quality of Support
7.5
8
8.9
182
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
9.0
140
Product Direction (% positive)
7.4
9
8.6
199
Features by Category
Operations
Not enough data
8.8
110
Not enough data
8.7
104
Not enough data
8.4
84
Not enough data
8.5
101
Cost Optimization
Not enough data
8.6
103
Not enough data
8.6
101
Not enough data
8.5
94
Administration
Not enough data
8.1
98
Not enough data
8.3
107
Not enough data
8.5
84
Agentic AI - Cloud Cost Management
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Functionality
Not enough data
8.8
8
Not enough data
8.8
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.8
8
Not enough data
7.7
8
Agentic AI - Database Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Monitoring
Not enough data
8.7
35
Not enough data
8.4
32
Not enough data
8.1
30
Not enough data
8.8
32
Not enough data
7.0
9
Administration
Not enough data
8.5
34
Not enough data
8.5
30
Not enough data
8.5
33
Not enough data
8.7
9
Analysis
Not enough data
7.9
34
Not enough data
7.9
34
Not enough data
8.3
34
Agentic AI - Cloud Infrastructure Monitoring
Not enough data
7.3
8
Not enough data
7.3
8
Not enough data
7.5
8
Not enough data
7.3
8
Not enough data
7.7
8
Not enough data
7.9
8
AI Automation - Cloud Infrastructure Monitoring
Not enough data
6.7
8
Not enough data
6.5
8
Functionality
Not enough data
8.1
24
Not enough data
8.3
23
Not enough data
8.5
24
Management
Not enough data
8.7
23
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.7
25
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Agentic AI - Cloud Management Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.3
17
Not enough data
8.5
16
Not enough data
8.8
16
Issue Resolution
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
17
Not enough data
8.6
17
Management
Not enough data
8.6
17
Not enough data
8.8
17
Not enough data
8.8
17
Generative AI
Not enough data
8.9
11
Not enough data
8.6
11
Agentic AI - AIOps Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.5
9
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
8.1
9
Not enough data
7.8
9
Management
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
9.1
9
Not enough data
9.4
9
Agentic AI - Enterprise Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance Management
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.6
7
Monitoring
Not enough data
9.0
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Alerts management
Not enough data
7.7
8
Not enough data
7.3
8
Not enough data
8.0
9
Monitoring
Not enough data
8.1
9
Not enough data
8.1
9
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Automation
Not enough data
7.1
8
Not enough data
7.3
8
Analysis
Not enough data
7.3
8
Not enough data
8.0
9
Not enough data
8.0
9
Not enough data
7.2
9
Issue Resolution
Not enough data
8.1
9
Not enough data
8.1
8
Not enough data
7.1
8
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - IT Alerting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Platform
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
8.2
21
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Security
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.6
25
Not enough data
8.1
25
Agentic AI - Enterprise IT Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Azure Cost Management and Billing and IBM Turbonomic are categorized as Cloud Cost Management
Unique Categories
Azure Cost Management and Billing has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Azure Cost Management and Billing
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
IBM Turbonomic
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
16.7%
Pharmaceuticals
8.3%
Non-Profit Organization Management
8.3%
Marketing and Advertising
8.3%
Insurance
8.3%
Other
50.0%
Information Technology and Services
18.0%
Computer Software
12.9%
Financial Services
5.9%
Telecommunications
5.5%
Computer & Network Security
4.7%
Other
52.9%
Alternatives
Discussions
Azure Cost Management and Billing has no discussions with answers
What is ParkMyCloud and how does it work?
1 Comment
Official Response from ParkMyCloud
ParkMyCloud is a SaaS platform that automatically identifies and eliminates public cloud resource waste, reducing spending by 65% or more — think “Nest for...Read more
Why do I need ParkMyCloud — what problem does it solve?
1 Comment
Official Response from ParkMyCloud
The popularity of cloud service providers like Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud Platform (GCP), and Alibaba Cloud has exploded...Read more
Which cloud service providers do you support?
1 Comment
Official Response from ParkMyCloud
ParkMyCloud supports Amazon Web Services (AWS) including AWS GovCloud (US), Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud Platform (GCP), and Alibaba Cloud.Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
