Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Azure Cosmos DB and Tiger Data 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
ER/Studio
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuestDB
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Dragonfly
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.4% of reviews)
Small-Business (78.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial
Azure Cosmos DB
Star Rating
(68)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Cosmos DBTiger Data
Star Rating
(33)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (78.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free Trial
Learn more about Tiger DataSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Azure Cosmos DB excels in scalability, with a score of 9.3, allowing businesses to handle large volumes of data seamlessly, while Timescale, although strong, does not match this level of scalability.
- Reviewers mention that Timescale offers superior support, achieving a perfect score of 10.0, which users appreciate for its responsiveness and helpfulness, contrasting with Azure Cosmos DB's support score of 8.6.
- G2 users highlight that Azure Cosmos DB's query language, while functional, received a lower score of 7.9 compared to Timescale's more user-friendly query capabilities, which are often praised for their ease of use.
- Users on G2 indicate that Timescale's performance in data management and analytics is noteworthy, with a score of 8.8 for database monitoring, which reviewers say provides valuable insights, whereas Azure Cosmos DB scored 8.3 in this area.
- Reviewers say that Azure Cosmos DB's data replication features are robust, scoring 8.7, which is essential for enterprise-level applications, while Timescale's replication capabilities, although effective, do not receive the same level of acclaim.
- Users report that Timescale shines in its built-in search functionality, scoring 9.2, which is a significant advantage for users needing efficient data retrieval, while Azure Cosmos DB's built-in search received a lower score of 7.0, indicating room for improvement.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Azure Cosmos DB
No pricing availableTiger Data
Free
Free Trial
30 day free trial. No credit card required.
- Create a fully-managed Timescale instance in 30 seconds.
- Ingest data at petabyte-scale with rock-solid reliability
- Analyze data using advanced time-series capabilities
Free Trial
Azure Cosmos DB
No trial information availableTiger Data
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
48
9.3
27
Ease of Use
8.2
48
9.0
27
Ease of Setup
8.0
22
8.5
17
Ease of Admin
7.7
23
8.7
10
Quality of Support
8.2
46
9.5
24
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.3
22
9.3
10
Product Direction (% positive)
9.0
47
9.1
27
Features by Category
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
5
Maintenance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.7
5
Management
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
8.6
7
Not enough data
8.6
6
Support
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.6
6
Security
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
9.0
7
Performance
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.6
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
9.2
8
Not enough data
8.8
8
Database Features
Not enough data
9.6
8
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
9.3
10
Not enough data
9.1
9
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
9.1
9
Not enough data
9.4
9
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
8.3
6
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
7.0
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
Availability
7.3
5
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
Performance
6.7
6
Not enough data
Security
8.1
6
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Storage
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Indexing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Filters
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Query latency
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data latency
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Connectors
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Scale
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Architecture
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Development
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Database
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.6
7
Infrastructure
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
8.1
6
Configuration
8.6
16
8.6
15
7.8
15
8.5
9
8.3
15
8.8
15
7.2
9
8.3
9
8.7
15
7.9
13
Database Administration
8.4
15
8.3
11
7.6
9
7.6
9
7.1
8
8.3
11
Availability
8.9
16
8.9
11
8.3
16
8.9
11
8.4
15
8.5
8
8.6
16
9.2
12
Security
7.2
6
8.8
8
7.2
6
7.1
11
5.6
6
8.6
7
Data Management
8.1
7
8.3
7
7.4
7
8.3
9
Database Features
Not enough data
9.6
8
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
9.3
10
Not enough data
9.1
9
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
9.1
9
Not enough data
9.4
9
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Azure Cosmos DB and Tiger Data are categorized as Database as a Service (DBaaS) and Columnar Databases
Unique Categories
Tiger Data is categorized as Real-time Analytic Database, Time Series Databases, Database Management Systems (DBMS), Relational Databases, Cloud Platform as a Service (PaaS), and Vector Database
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Azure Cosmos DB
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Tiger Data
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
23.7%
Computer Software
20.3%
Internet
8.5%
Retail
5.1%
Gambling & Casinos
3.4%
Other
39.0%
Computer Software
24.2%
Financial Services
21.2%
Information Technology and Services
12.1%
Consulting
6.1%
Renewables & Environment
6.1%
Other
30.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
Azure Cosmos DB has no discussions with answers
Tiger Data has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
